2006
DOI: 10.1053/j.ackd.2006.04.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antimicrobial Locks: Putting the Lock on Catheter Infections

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is a major concern for the CDC and the primary reason for the lack of a recommendation for the routine use of any prophylactic antibiotic lock, because studies showing efficacy in reducing CRBSI are numerous (11)(12)(13)(14)(15). Most studies evaluating efficacy of antibiotic lock have been of small size and/or short duration, not allowing for the ability to evaluate antibiotic resistance over longer periods of time or in a real world setting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is a major concern for the CDC and the primary reason for the lack of a recommendation for the routine use of any prophylactic antibiotic lock, because studies showing efficacy in reducing CRBSI are numerous (11)(12)(13)(14)(15). Most studies evaluating efficacy of antibiotic lock have been of small size and/or short duration, not allowing for the ability to evaluate antibiotic resistance over longer periods of time or in a real world setting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many randomized, controlled studies have confirmed that a prophylactic antimicrobial lock strategy reduces the incidence of CRBSI, and it has been suggested that, for every four patients treated with antimicrobial lock, one CRBSI is prevented (11)(12)(13)(14)(15). Furthermore, two small randomized, controlled trials showed a reduction in mortality on crude analysis by use of a prophylactic antimicrobial lock solution (16,17).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This technique involves instilling a highly concentrated antimicrobial−anticoagulant solution at the end of a dialysis session which "locks" the catheter when it is not in use [38]. Although antibiotics can kill circulating planktonic microorganisms and treat CRBs, they cannot kill the biofilm pathogens that constitute the source of recurrent infections.…”
Section: Time For Preventing Recurrence Of Catheter-related Bacteremiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The antimicrobial concentration used to eradicate microorganisms within the biofilm should be 100−1,000 times greater compared with the required concentrations to eliminate planktonic organisms. Such concentrations cannot usually be reached by systemic antibiotic therapy but might be achieved with the use of AMLs [38].…”
Section: Time For Preventing Recurrence Of Catheter-related Bacteremiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to reduce the risk of infection, a number of measures have been developed to improve the safety of venous line service, which include among the others, new types of plugs, "antibacterial" catheters, new types of dressings and filling catheter when not in use with an antibiotic or other agent of biocidal action, usually ethanol and recently taurolidine. The fundamental treatment method of catheter related bloodstream infections is to remove the catheter -source and at the same time foreign body sustaining infection -and appropriate antibiotic treatment (2). Systemically administrated antibiotics kill microorganisms in blood but do not destroy those inhabiting the catheter and infection symptoms recur in 20 to 50%, since the low concentration of the antibiotic in the solution administered intravenously by colonized catheter, does not allow its penetration into the biofilm, which ultimately leads to the removal of the central catheter (3).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%