Antimicrobial Peptides 2013
DOI: 10.1002/9783527652853.ch1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antimicrobial Peptides: Their History, Evolution, and Functional Promiscuity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 317 publications
(220 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A variety of resistance mechanisms to AMPs have been described in bacteria, which generally involve the inherent properties of these organisms rather than the acquisition of dedicated resistance genes 13 . This intrinsic protection from AMPs is generally moderate in level and relatively non-specific in nature, which is reflected in the low frequency of resistant bacteria and the evolutionary persistence and success of these peptides 14 . The evolution of bacterial resistance to AMPs has been demonstrated experimentally 15 , but based on the pharmacodynamics of these peptides, it has been predicted that they are much less likely to select for resistant mutants in vivo than conventional antibiotics 16 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A variety of resistance mechanisms to AMPs have been described in bacteria, which generally involve the inherent properties of these organisms rather than the acquisition of dedicated resistance genes 13 . This intrinsic protection from AMPs is generally moderate in level and relatively non-specific in nature, which is reflected in the low frequency of resistant bacteria and the evolutionary persistence and success of these peptides 14 . The evolution of bacterial resistance to AMPs has been demonstrated experimentally 15 , but based on the pharmacodynamics of these peptides, it has been predicted that they are much less likely to select for resistant mutants in vivo than conventional antibiotics 16 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although AMPs have been known since 1939 [15] (i.e., the first isolated peptides were gramicidins from the soil bacteria Aneurinibacillus migulanus), it was not until 1981 that the first insect antimicrobial peptide, named cecropin, was identified from the hemolymph of the Hyalophora cecropia pupae [59,60]. Several AMPs that can be classified according to their structure or function in different families (such as cecropins, ponericins, defensins, lebocins, drosocin, Metchnikowin, gloverins, diptericins and attacins) are presently known in insects.…”
Section: Insects Antimicrobial Peptides: a Brief Insightmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since AMPs most likely derive from multiple independent evolutionary events, these molecules display an astounding diversity among taxa [2,15,16], but, at the same time, they share some common physicochemical properties that allow their classification into broad categories.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Peptide focused research has been undertaken for over 100 years, concentrating particularly on neuropeptides and peptides with various bioactivities (e.g., antimicrobial, cell penetrating and ACE-inhibition). Until recently, the high throughput study of peptidomes was not achievable and as such endogenous proteolytic events occurring in peptidomes of interest remained largely unexplored.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%