2020
DOI: 10.3390/pathogens9080643
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antimicrobial Resistance and Biofilm Formation Capacity of Salmonella enterica Serovar Enteritidis Strains Isolated from Poultry and Humans in Poland

Abstract: Salmonella enterica ser. Enteritidis (S. enterica ser. Enteritidis) is the most frequently detected serovar in human salmonellosis, and its ability to produce a biofilm and the risk of transmission from animals and food of animal origin to humans are significant. The main aim of the present work was to compare S. enterica ser. Enteritidis strains isolated from poultry and human feces in terms of resistance profiles, prevalence of selected resistance genes, and their potential for biofilm formation, by assessin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
1
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
1
17
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Salmonella enterica bacteria represent the main foodborne pathogens that are responsible for enteric infections and food poisoning [2]. In addition to the disseminated antibacterial resistance among S. enterica isolates, they can form biofilms and synthesize many cell surface components [3]. Biofilms are structured communities of one or more species of bacteria embedded in a self-produced polymeric matrix attached to either biotic or abiotic surfaces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Salmonella enterica bacteria represent the main foodborne pathogens that are responsible for enteric infections and food poisoning [2]. In addition to the disseminated antibacterial resistance among S. enterica isolates, they can form biofilms and synthesize many cell surface components [3]. Biofilms are structured communities of one or more species of bacteria embedded in a self-produced polymeric matrix attached to either biotic or abiotic surfaces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The highest resistance in the case of streptogramins, carbapenems, fluoroquinolones, aminoglycosides, penicillins; the lowest in the case of nitrofurantoin and chloramphenicol; E. faecalis strains were more resistant than the E. faecium; presence of multidrug resistance of isolates - Cybulska and Krzyśko-Łupicka 2020 (PL) environmental samples from chicken broilers, turkey broilers and laying hens; 51 isolates from 2 veterinary laboratories originated from livestock environment; n/a Salmonella enterica ser. Enteritidis minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC); molecular methods all isolates susceptible to gentamicin, tazobactam, cefotaxime, meropenem, azithromycin, tigecycline and trimethoprim, ampicillin, 84.3% isolates resistant to colistin, 56.9% to sulfamethoxazole; 41.2% to nalidixic acid, 21.6% to tetracycline, 3.9% to chloramphenicol, 2.0% to ciprofloxacin 14 isolates showing multidrug resistance; resistance genes: flo R (51.0%), bla TEM (35.3%), bla PSE (5.9%), tet A (37.3%), tet B (17.6%), tet C (2.0%), tet G (3.9%), cat 1 (11.8%) Ćwiek et al 2020 (PL) feed samples provided as part of official controls; 452 animal feed samples (complete feedingstuff, premixtures, concentrates, feed additives, and water, 126 flush material samples (mixtures or feed materials used to flush the production line after producing a batch of medicated feed); n/a n/a agar well diffusion method (microbiological diffusion screening method based on the growth inhibition of selected test strains) antibacterial substances confirmed in 185 samples (57 samples of flush material, 127 samples of feed, 1 sample of water) - Przeniosło-Siwczyńska and Kwiatek 2013b (PL) poultry and pig farms samples from, animal feed, and sources, such as food and sewage sludge n/a 560 Salmonella isolates; 42 different serotypes of Salmonella ATBVET diagnostic kits 12.9% of isolates susceptible to all 28 antimicrobial substances; resistance in 488 (87.1%) of isolates; 37.3% strains resistant to few antimicrobial substances; 49.8% strains were multiresistant; bacteria originating from pigs showed more resistance than from poultry and feed samples; Multidrug resistance observed in the majority of S. Typhimurium...…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These genes were chosen as a molecular resistance mechanism of E. coli to the selected antimicrobials used for antimicrobial susceptibility tests in this study. Sequenced PCR products of resistance genes, collected during previous studies, were used as positive controls in this study [ 41 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%