2005
DOI: 10.1179/joc.2005.17.1.54
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antimicrobial Resistance of Nosocomial Strains ofStaphylococcus aureusin Russia: Results of a Prospective Study

Abstract: A total of 879 Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates from 17 medical institutions in different regions of Russia were tested. Susceptibility to 18 antimicrobials was determined by agar dilution in accordance with the NCCLS recommendations. The most potent antimicrobials were glycopeptides, linezolid, and fusidic acid, to which no resistance was found. Other antimicrobials with low frequency of non-susceptibility were mupirocin (0.3%), trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (0.8%), quinupristin/dalfopristin (1.8%) and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…21 In a study performed in 17 different regions of Russia, methicillin resistance among S aureus strains was between 0% and 89.5%. 22 The differences in the prevalence of MRSA in different countries emphasize the importance of local surveillance in generating relevant local resistance data that can guide empiric therapy. 23 There was a statistically significant difference of MRSA presence between inpatients (63.9%) and outpatients (13%) (p Z 0.000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21 In a study performed in 17 different regions of Russia, methicillin resistance among S aureus strains was between 0% and 89.5%. 22 The differences in the prevalence of MRSA in different countries emphasize the importance of local surveillance in generating relevant local resistance data that can guide empiric therapy. 23 There was a statistically significant difference of MRSA presence between inpatients (63.9%) and outpatients (13%) (p Z 0.000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2) [11,42,[44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57]. The Russian clone (ST239/ SCCmecIII R ) can also be noted [57].…”
Section: Ha-mrsamentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Abbreviations: MIC90, minimum inhibitory concentration for 90% of isolates. Note: For entries with multiple studies, data are the range.To be included, studies had to have a minimum of 10 isolates of the microorganism-of-interest, use a National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards - approved methodology, and an inoculum of 10 4 –10 6 organisms.References:1, Stratchounski et al 2005; 2, Blondeau et al 2000; 3, Jacobs et al 2004; 4, Goldstein et al 2000; 5, Goldstein et al 1997; 6, Malathum et al 1999; 7, Bowker et al 2003; 8, Noviello et al 2003; 9, Speciale et al 2002; 10, von Eiff et al 1999; 11, Bauernfeind 1997; 12, Patel et al 2004; 13,Wenzler et al 2004; 14, Edmiston et al 2004; 15, Fung-Tomc et al 2000; 16, Milatovic et al 2000; 17, Hardy et al 2000; 18, Barry et al 1999; 19, Fass 1997; 20,Woodcock et al 1997; 21, Bogdanovich et al 2005; 22, Dalhoff et al 1996; 23, Hoogkamp-Korstanje et al 2000; 24, Hsueh et al 2003; 25, Amabile-Cuevas et al 2001; 26, Blondeau 2002; 27, Edmiston et al 2005.…”
Section: In Vitro Antimicrobial Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%