1985
DOI: 10.1128/aac.27.3.324
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antimicrobial susceptibilities of anaerobic bacteria isolated from female genital tract infections

Abstract: Certain species or subspecies of anaerobic bacteria are isolated with higher frequency from female genital tract infections than from other anatomic sites. To gain susceptibility data more specific to the treatment of these infections, nine antimicrobial agents were tested by an agar dilution technique against 230 anaerobic bacteria isolated solely from obstetric and gynecological infections. These genital isolates were, in general, very susceptible to imipenem (most active, inhibiting all gram-negative rods a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

1987
1987
1995
1995

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Scattered information on this topic can nevertheless be obtained in publications dealing with the comparative effects of different antimicrobial agents on anaerobic bacteria. Most published work confirms the general susceptibilities of the isolates to erythromycin or clindamycin (5,9,10). However, clindamycin-and/or erythromycin-resistant strains were found in some studies (1,3,15).…”
supporting
confidence: 57%
“…Scattered information on this topic can nevertheless be obtained in publications dealing with the comparative effects of different antimicrobial agents on anaerobic bacteria. Most published work confirms the general susceptibilities of the isolates to erythromycin or clindamycin (5,9,10). However, clindamycin-and/or erythromycin-resistant strains were found in some studies (1,3,15).…”
supporting
confidence: 57%
“…Later studies showed an increase in the frequency of detection of IMactamase producing fusobacteria. In 1983 Aldridge et al However, other recent studies did not find any penicillin-resistant fusobacteria in 31 strains studied (4,8,31). Tuner and her co-workers (17) described a l~-lactamase in Fusobacterium nucleatum in 1985 (17), and in 1987 reported 4 of 40 fusobacteria to be 13-1actamase producers (32).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…3-lactamase-negative strains was 2 ,ug/ml; that for 3-lactamelaninogenicus (two), B. intermedius (one), F. mortiferum mase-positive strains was 8 ,ug/ml (Tables 3 and 4 (5). Other recent studies did not find any penicillin-resistant fusobacteria in 31 strains studied (7,16,23 ,ug/ml. Our findings confirm previous reports of susceptibility to these agents (3,9,12,18,19,23,30 The results of the current study emphasize significant rates of P-lactamase production in non-B.…”
mentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Although the Bacteroides fragilis group comprises the most important group of anaerobic gram-negative pathogens, infections with other Bacteroides species and fusobacteria are increasingly encountered (2,11,16,17,26,28). As the susceptibility patterns of these organism groups has been assumed to be relatively stable, routine susceptibility testing has not been regarded as necessary (24,27,28).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%