2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2015.03.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antimicrobial susceptibility monitoring of mastitis pathogens isolated from acute cases of clinical mastitis in dairy cows across Europe: VetPath results

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
64
4
5

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
15
64
4
5
Order By: Relevance
“…In this same study, the authors reported lower levels of resistance to tetracycline (7.2%) than ours (18.1%); this may also be due to differences in breakpoints used and a heterogeneous spatial distribution of AMR in mastitis, potentially linked to a heterogeneous spatial distribution of practices and farm management. Recently, a European study performed on 282 S. uberis isolates from dairy cattle with clinical mastitis found results similar to ours for erythromycin resistance (20.0%), but they identified higher resistance to tetracycline (28.7% using the CLSI breakpoint; Thomas et al, 2015).…”
Section: Antimicrobial Resistance In Bacteria Involved In Mastitissupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this same study, the authors reported lower levels of resistance to tetracycline (7.2%) than ours (18.1%); this may also be due to differences in breakpoints used and a heterogeneous spatial distribution of AMR in mastitis, potentially linked to a heterogeneous spatial distribution of practices and farm management. Recently, a European study performed on 282 S. uberis isolates from dairy cattle with clinical mastitis found results similar to ours for erythromycin resistance (20.0%), but they identified higher resistance to tetracycline (28.7% using the CLSI breakpoint; Thomas et al, 2015).…”
Section: Antimicrobial Resistance In Bacteria Involved In Mastitissupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Because the use of antibiotics can lead to resistance (Aarestrup, 2015), AMR occurrence must be carefully monitored to guide prudent prescription (Thomas et al, 2015). Hundreds of publications describe the proportion of AMR in bovine mastitis pathogens in the last decades (Barlow, 2011), highlighting differences in AMR proportions between areas and populations (Erskine et al, 2002;Makovec and Ruegg, 2003;Pitkälä et al, 2004;Osterås et al, 2006;Tenhagen et al, 2006;Botrel et al, 2010;Idriss et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with 8 European countries (Thomas et al, 2015), resistance rates were higher in our Chinese study. We found major differences in antimicrobial consumption patterns among countries (Mather et al, 2011), reflecting a combination of factors including national guidelines for proper antimicrobial use, veterinarian prescription patterns, pharmaceutical marketing strategies, animal demographics, and specific needs for antimicrobials in specific countries (ESVAC, 2012).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 63%
“…Therefore, it can be speculated that the E. coli strains showed a high resistance to amoxicillin. Resistance rates towards tetracycline were 9.0% in the European Union (Thomas et al, 2015), 14.3% in Canada (Saini et al, 2012), and 55.1% in Southwestern Nigeria (Adesoji, Ogunjobi, Olatoye, & Douglas, 2015). Moreover, 34.8% isolates had MDR (Figure 1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%