1997
DOI: 10.1128/aac.41.6.1301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antimicrobial susceptibility of flavobacteria as determined by agar dilution and disk diffusion methods

Abstract: A total of 106 clinical isolates of flavobacteria, including 41 isolates of Flavobacterium meningosepticum, 59 of Flavobacterium indologenes, and 6 of Flavobacterium odoratum were collected from January 1992 to December 1995 from patients in Taiwan. The in vitro activities of antimicrobial agents were determined concomitantly by the standard agar dilution and disk diffusion methods. More than 90% of the flavobacterial isolates were resistant to cephalothin, cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, moxalactam, aztreonam, imipe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

5
43
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
5
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both, C. meningosepticum, and C. indologenes, are resistant to most antimicrobial agents used to treat Gram-negative bacteria but are susceptible to agents used to treat Gram-positive bacterial infections like vancomycin, erythromycin and clindamycin. [7] However, the present strain of C. gleum, was resistant to vancomycin, erythromycin and clindamycin which is consistent with an earlier study, [8] emphasising the need for speciation and antimicrobial susceptibility for these group of NFGNBs. Though ciprofloxacin and newer fluoroquinolones (garenoxacin, gatifloxacin and levofloxacin) have been cited as the most appropriate antimicrobial agents to treat Chryseobacterium spp.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Both, C. meningosepticum, and C. indologenes, are resistant to most antimicrobial agents used to treat Gram-negative bacteria but are susceptible to agents used to treat Gram-positive bacterial infections like vancomycin, erythromycin and clindamycin. [7] However, the present strain of C. gleum, was resistant to vancomycin, erythromycin and clindamycin which is consistent with an earlier study, [8] emphasising the need for speciation and antimicrobial susceptibility for these group of NFGNBs. Though ciprofloxacin and newer fluoroquinolones (garenoxacin, gatifloxacin and levofloxacin) have been cited as the most appropriate antimicrobial agents to treat Chryseobacterium spp.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Based on the results of sensitivity testing studies published to date in the literature, the susceptibility of M. odoratimimus to various classes of antibiotics appears to mirror that of M. odoratus, but at a lower level [24][25][26][27]. Actually, the strain isolated from our patient retained susceptibility only to carbapenems and antipseudomonal penicillins, and was resistant to all other b-lactams tested (including aztreonam), as well as to aminoglycosides, quinolones, and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The treatment of Myroides infection is often difficult, since most strains are resistant to the b-lactams, including aztreonam and carbapenems, and exhibit variable susceptibility to aminoglycosides, quinolones, and sulfamethoxazole [24][25][26]. Based on the results of sensitivity testing studies published to date in the literature, the susceptibility of M. odoratimimus to various classes of antibiotics appears to mirror that of M. odoratus, but at a lower level [24][25][26][27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…is characterized by resistance to a wide range of antimicrobial agents that have satisfactory activity against other Gram-negative bacteria. Most strains are resistant to the β-lactams, including aztreonam and carbapenems, and exhibit variable susceptibility to aminoglycosides, quinolones, and sulfamethoxazole (39, 40). Resistance to β-lactams is due to the production of chromosome-encoded metallo-β-lactamases, both in M. odoratum (TUS-1) and M. odoratimimus (MUS) (41).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%