2018
DOI: 10.1186/s12879-018-3407-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antimicrobial use by WHO methodology at primary health care centers: a cross sectional study in Punjab, Pakistan

Abstract: BackgroundTo investigate the antimicrobial (AM) use and prescribing patterns at primary health care centers (PHCCs) in Punjab, Pakistan.MethodsA cross-sectional study was designed according to the World Health Organization (WHO) methodology for AM usage from January, 2017 to June, 2017. Standard data collection forms designed by the WHO were used to collect the data from 32 PHCCs (16 rural healthcare centers (RHCs) and 16 basic health units (BHUs)) in Punjab province of Pakistan. PHCCs were randomly selected f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
31
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
31
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the 21 studies that reported the total number of patients attending a certain facility at the time of data collection [27,28,30,32,36,38,39 [46,57]. We could not identify any specific pattern in the distribution of antibiotic prescription rates across levels of country income, partly due to small sample sizes.…”
Section: Prevalence Of Antibiotic Prescriptionmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Among the 21 studies that reported the total number of patients attending a certain facility at the time of data collection [27,28,30,32,36,38,39 [46,57]. We could not identify any specific pattern in the distribution of antibiotic prescription rates across levels of country income, partly due to small sample sizes.…”
Section: Prevalence Of Antibiotic Prescriptionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…In most cases, the authors made their judgment based on national and/or international guidelines for treatment of key conditions. Among the 9 studies that assessed the rationality of antibiotic prescriptions [36,39,46,53,55,62,64,65,67], the proportion judged inappropriate ranged widely, reflecting the significant differences in study designs as well as in the sets of criteria that were adopted to determine the outcome ( Table 2). The lowest level of inappropriate prescription (7.9%; 95% CI: 4.6%-12.5%) was reported in a study conducted in Zambia that included 537 children aged <5 years presenting with an acute respiratory syndrome, of whom 37.6% (95% CI: 33.5%-41.9%) were given antibiotics [39].…”
Section: Inappropriate Antibiotic Prescriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different studies have shown that as much as half of prescribed medicines are inappropriately prescribed or dispensed. Moreover the association between an increased misuse of antibiotics and emergence and spread of resistant microorganisms has been confirmed by many studies [2][3][4][5][6][7][8]. Inappropriate prescribing of antibiotics, i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Interestingly, despite reports of antibiotics being regularly out of stock in many of the Pakistani public healthcare facilities, their sales are high in different pharmacies and regions. These primary healthcare facilities lack proper standard treatment guidelines for prescribers, with the result that almost 80% of the prescriptions in both outpatient and inpatient departments were found to be improper, and the most commonly prescribed antibiotics included fluoroquinolones, cephalosporins, and penicillins [17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%