2013
DOI: 10.4238/2013.may.14.5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antimutagenic and anticarcinogenic effects of wheat bran in vivo

Abstract: ABSTRACT. Previous studies in rodents treated with the pro-carcinogen 1,2-dimethylhydrazine suggested that the consumption of wheat bran protected against DNA damage in the colon and rectum. Based on this information, we evaluated wheat bran as a functional food in the prevention and treatment of colon cancer. We used the aberrant crypt focus assay to evaluate the anticarcinogenic potential of wheat bran (Triticum aestivum Dietary wheat bran chemoprevention in vivo variety CD-104), the comet assay to evaluate … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
27
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The collection of blood samples (caudal puncture) was carried out on 24 h (T1) to evaluate the (anti) genotoxicity by the comet assay and 24, 48, and 72 h, corresponding to T1, T2, and T3, respectively, to evaluate the (anti) mutagenicity using the micronucleus test. At the end of the experimentation period (12 weeks) the animals were euthanized for evaluation of (anti) carcinogenicity through the foci of aberrant crypts Pesarini et al, 2013;Navarro et al, 2015). The control group received distilled water by gavage every day until the 12th week.…”
Section: Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The collection of blood samples (caudal puncture) was carried out on 24 h (T1) to evaluate the (anti) genotoxicity by the comet assay and 24, 48, and 72 h, corresponding to T1, T2, and T3, respectively, to evaluate the (anti) mutagenicity using the micronucleus test. At the end of the experimentation period (12 weeks) the animals were euthanized for evaluation of (anti) carcinogenicity through the foci of aberrant crypts Pesarini et al, 2013;Navarro et al, 2015). The control group received distilled water by gavage every day until the 12th week.…”
Section: Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…administered twice a week for two consecutive weeks, intraperitoneally (ip) (Ishii et al, 2011;Mauro et al, 2013;Cantero et al, 2015;Navarro et al, 2015). During the use, DMH was diluted in EDTA solution (0.37 mg/mL) with the same solution used as a vehicle for the control group treatment (Ishii et al, 2011;Mauro et al, 2013;Pesarini et al, 2013;Cantero et al, 2015;Navarro et al, 2015). DMH is an indirect trigger of colorectal carcinogenesis andone of the most used drugs in experimental models (Jucá et al, 2014).…”
Section: Induction Of Colorectal Carcinogenesismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The animals were treated for 120 days according to the protocols of Mauro et al (2013) and Pesarini et al (2013), with modifications. The experimental groups are described below.…”
Section: Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diets with these characteristics are generally rich in pre-and probiotics (Burns and Rowland, 2004;Mauro et al, 2013;Pesarini et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%