2013
DOI: 10.1179/1351000213y.0000000043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antioxidant action of the hexahydropyridoindole SMe1EC2 in the cellular system of isolated red blood cellsin vitro

Abstract: Objectives: The subject of this study was the hexahydropyridoindole compound SMe1EC2 with reported antioxidant and neuroprotective effects and low toxicity. In this study, the antioxidant action of SMe1EC2 was investigated in a greater detail in the system of isolated rat erythrocytes. Methods: First, the compound was subjected to the DPPH test. Second, the overall antioxidant action of the compound was studied in the cellular system of isolated rat erythrocytes oxidatively stressed by free radicals derived fr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In membranes, however, the relative reactivities may be different since they are determined also by additional factors such as location of the antioxidant and radicals, ruled predominantly by their actual distribution ratios between water and lipid compartments. As we reported earlier (Stefek et al , 2013 ), SMe1EC2 and stobadine have similar lipophilicities, characterized by the corresponding log P values of 1.95 and 1.79, respectively. Yet their actual distribution ratios at pH 7.4 were shown to differ profoundly (calculated log D SMe1EC2 =1.78 vs. calculated log D stobadine =–0.05) as a result of basicity variance of SMe1EC2 vs. stobadine, characterized by respective pKa values, –3.7 vs. 8.5.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In membranes, however, the relative reactivities may be different since they are determined also by additional factors such as location of the antioxidant and radicals, ruled predominantly by their actual distribution ratios between water and lipid compartments. As we reported earlier (Stefek et al , 2013 ), SMe1EC2 and stobadine have similar lipophilicities, characterized by the corresponding log P values of 1.95 and 1.79, respectively. Yet their actual distribution ratios at pH 7.4 were shown to differ profoundly (calculated log D SMe1EC2 =1.78 vs. calculated log D stobadine =–0.05) as a result of basicity variance of SMe1EC2 vs. stobadine, characterized by respective pKa values, –3.7 vs. 8.5.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…In our previous study (Stefek et al , 2013 ), on applying a DPPH test, we reported efficient free radical scavenging activity of SMe1EC2, comparable with that of the standard trolox. In the cellular system of isolated erythrocytes, SMe1EC2 protected red blood cells against free-radical-initiated hemolysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Anti-infl ammatory and anti-oxidative effects with high free radicals scavenging activity is also known for SMe1EC2 (38,39). Both atorvastatin and SMe1EC2 can thus protect the heart from excessive oxidative damage following ischemia/reperfusion injury.…”
Section: Tab 3 Occurrence Of Ventricular Arrhythmia In Animals Amonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SMe1EC2 had high intrinsic scavenging activity as measured with 1,1TM-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) (Stefek et al, 2013 ). The initial velocity of DPPH decolorization by 50 μM SMe1EC2 (0.507 ± 0.003 optical density(OD)/min) was comparable with that of equimolar trolox (0.494 ± 0.009 OD/min).…”
Section: Antioxidant Properties In An Example Mtdlmentioning
confidence: 99%