2006
DOI: 10.4141/p06-113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antioxidant capacity in June-bearing and day-neutral strawberry

Abstract: Khanizadeh, S., Ehsani-Moghaddam, B. and Levasseur, A. 2006. Antioxidant capacity in June-bearing and day-neutral strawberry. Can. J. Plant Sci. 86: 1387-1390. The present study was carried out to estimate the crude, hydrophilic and lipophilic antioxidant content of known and new advanced selections among June-bearing and day-neutral genotypes using Trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity method. Crude, hydrophilic and lipophilic extractions were prepared using 25 g of frozen fruits from each sample. In June-be… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
6
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
3
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The changing trends in the TPC and AC were slightly similar in fruits with or without fungus inoculation during the five-day storage period, indicating that there was a certain correlation between them. These results are in agreement with the work of other researchers (Wang, Cao, & Prior, 1996;Wang & Jiao 2000;Wang & Lin 2000;Kalt et al 2003;Rekika et al 2005;Khanizadeh, Ehsani-Moghaddam, & Levasseur, 2006b). Although PAL is considered to be the key enzyme in phenolic biosynthesis (Hao et al, 1996), we did not find any significant correlation between the PAL activity and the TPC of strawberries with or without fungus inoculation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The changing trends in the TPC and AC were slightly similar in fruits with or without fungus inoculation during the five-day storage period, indicating that there was a certain correlation between them. These results are in agreement with the work of other researchers (Wang, Cao, & Prior, 1996;Wang & Jiao 2000;Wang & Lin 2000;Kalt et al 2003;Rekika et al 2005;Khanizadeh, Ehsani-Moghaddam, & Levasseur, 2006b). Although PAL is considered to be the key enzyme in phenolic biosynthesis (Hao et al, 1996), we did not find any significant correlation between the PAL activity and the TPC of strawberries with or without fungus inoculation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The results obtained were in agreement with work of other researchers. [7,[39][40][41][42][43][44]50] A high and significant correlation was observed between total anthocyanins and total phenolics (r = 0.88, p < 0.0001), while no significant correlation was found between total anthocyanins and TPC, similar to previous reports. [11,45] These results may be due to other un-quantified phenolics or vitamins, synergism among these compounds, major phenolics affecting the expected correlation between phenolics, and antioxidant activities.…”
Section: Total Phenolic Content Antioxidant Capacity and Phenolic Csupporting
confidence: 91%
“…but also to pay particular attention to chemical composition, such as SS, acidity and polyphenol content, which affects fruit quality. Polyphenols and other chemical compositions like superoxide dismutase have a direct effect on plant disease resistance and shelf life and these groups of compounds, especially ellagic acid, could also be used as markers to select for fruit quality, not only due to their potential health-related activity but also to their possible effect on postharvest quality of the fruits , 2008Khanizadeh, Ehsani-Moghaddam, & Levasseur, 2006;Khanizadeh, Tsao, Rekika, Yang, & DeEll, 2007;Wang, Khanizadeh, & Vigneault, 2007). Fruit phenolic compounds have been studied extensively and in addition to their important functions in plant defense mechanisms and external stresses (Di Venere et al, 1998;Feucht, Treutter, & Christ, 1992;Mayr, Treutter, Santos-Buelga, Bauer, & Feucht, 1995;Wang, Cao, & Prior, 1996), they also affect the quality, color and taste of fruit along with SS and acidity (Bushway, Hu, & Shupp, 2002;Robards, Prenzler, Tucker, Swatsitang, & Glover, 1999;Van der Sluis, Dekker, Skrede, & Jongen, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%