Through detailed interrogation of the molecular pathways that contribute to the development of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), the separate but related processes of oxidative stress and cellular metabolic dysfunction have emerged as being critical pathogenic mechanisms that are as yet relatively untargeted therapeutically. In this review, we have attempted to summarize some of the important existing studies, to point out areas of overlap between oxidative stress and metabolic dysfunction, and to do so under the unifying heading of redox biology. We discuss the importance of precision in assessing oxidant signaling versus oxidant injury and why this distinction matters. We endeavor to advance the discussion of carbon-substrate metabolism beyond a focus on glucose and its fate in the cell to encompass other carbon substrates and some of the murkiness surrounding our understanding of how they are handled in different cell types. Finally, we try to bring these ideas together at the level of the mitochondrion and to point out some additional points of possible cognitive dissonance that warrant further experimental probing. The body of beautiful science regarding the molecular and cellular details of redox biology in PAH points to a future that includes clinically useful therapies that target these pathways. To fully realize the potential of these future interventions, we hope that some of the issues raised in this review can be addressed proactively.Keywords: bone morphogenetic protein receptor 2, Warburg, 3-nitrotyrosine, nitrosylation. Considered in a positive light, the intense investigative efforts into the pathogenesis of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) over the past several decades can be viewed as a major success. We continue to gain more-detailed insights into the molecular mechanisms that cause and sustain disease. New therapeutics are being successfully tested and approved for human use, with more in the developmental pipeline. Emerging data suggest not only that the thoughtful and aggressive use of existing therapies has improved the quality of life and functional status for patients with PAH but also that these therapies have actually had a measurable positive impact on survival. 1 However, most investigators in the field remain driven by a lingering dissatisfaction. Although existing therapies are certainly beneficial in terms of improving functional status and quality of life and likely have a measurable survival benefit, many patients still will progress to the end points of death or need for transplantation. In tissues collected from these individuals, either at autopsy or at explantation of the diseased lungs, it appears that targeted therapies have not changed the course of the pulmonary vascular pathology.2 New drugs continue to be developed and approved for clinical use, but most of these target the same signaling pathways (e.g., prostacyclin, endothelin, and nitric oxide) as the first generation of PAH drugs. 3-5 Despite impressive progress, then, we still lack some fundame...