New
antioxidants are commonly evaluated via two main approaches,
i.e., the ability to donate an electron and the ability to intercept
free radicals. We compared these approaches by evaluating the properties
of 11 compounds containing both antioxidant moieties (mono- and polyphenols)
and auxiliary pharmacophores (pyrrolidone and caprolactam). Several
common antioxidants, such as butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT), 2,3,5-trimethylphenol
(TMP), quercetin, and dihydroquercetin, were added for comparison.
The antioxidant properties of these compounds were determined by their
rates of reaction with 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical
and their oxidation potentials from cyclic voltammetry. Although these
methods test different chemical properties, their results correlate
reasonably well. However, several exceptions exist where the two methods
give opposite predictions! One of them is the different behavior of
mono- and polyphenols: polyphenols can react with DPPH more than an
order of magnitude faster than monophenols of a similar oxidation
potential. The second exception stems from the size of a “bystander”
lactam ring at the benzylic position. Although the phenols with a
seven-membered lactam ring are harder to oxidize, the sterically nonhindered
compounds react with DPPH about 2× faster than the analogous
five-membered lactams. The limitations of computational methods, especially
those based on a single parameter, are also evaluated and discussed.