2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.09.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antiplatelet Therapy vs Anticoagulation Therapy in Cervical Artery Dissection: The Cervical Artery Dissection in Stroke Study (CADISS) Randomized Clinical Trial Final Results.

Abstract: The country you live in plays a large part in whether you undergo carotid endarterectomy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
93
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
93
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…It is already established that aspirin 81-325 milligrams (mg) or clopidrogel 75 mg daily is bio-equivalent to oral anti-coagulation with warfarin for stable vertebral and carotid arterial dissections with respect to angiographic resolution and prevention of ischemic events [ 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 ]. A brief outline of these studies with the main outcomes is illustrated in Table 2 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is already established that aspirin 81-325 milligrams (mg) or clopidrogel 75 mg daily is bio-equivalent to oral anti-coagulation with warfarin for stable vertebral and carotid arterial dissections with respect to angiographic resolution and prevention of ischemic events [ 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 ]. A brief outline of these studies with the main outcomes is illustrated in Table 2 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main purpose of treating VAD is either to stabilize the thrombus or to reduce further thrombus formation, which could primarily prevent stroke; However, if a stroke has already occurred, the aim is to prevent progression or recurrence [ 14 ]. So far, only the Cervical Artery Dissection in Stroke Study (CADISS) trial has assessed the use of antiplatelets versus anticoagulants to reduce stroke risk; they concluded that there was no difference between treatment groups either in outcome events or the rate of recanalization [ 15 ]. The treatment of intracranial VAD is much more complicated and warrants optimized management strategies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diagnosis should be confirmed by imaging (including conventional angiography, CT angiography, magnetic resonance angiography or Doppler ultrasound imaging). Of note, 20% of cases of dissection in the CADISS trial could not be confirmed following central review of imaging, 13 highlighting the challenges in definitive diagnosis. Studies that do not list their radiological diagnostic criteria will not be excluded but any specific criteria used for diagnosis will be noted in the data extraction form and this will be considered in the final interpretation of results.…”
Section: Methods and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%