Existing tools for rapid cognitive assessment in HIV-positive individuals with mild cognitive deficits lack sensitivity or do not meet psychometric requirements for tracking changes in cognitive ability over time.
MethodsSeventy-five nondemented HIV-positive patients were evaluated with the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), a brief battery of standardized neuropsychological tests, and computerized tasks evaluating frontal-executive function and processing speed. Rasch analyses were applied to the MoCA data set and subsequently to the full set of data from all tests.
ResultsThe MoCA was found to adequately measure cognitive ability as a single, global construct in this HIV-positive cohort, although it showed poorer precision for measuring patients of higher ability. Combining the additional tests with the MoCA resulted in a battery with better psychometric properties that also better targeted the range of abilities in this cohort.
ConclusionThis application of modern test development techniques shows a path towards a quick, quantitative, global approach to cognitive assessment with promise both for initial detection and for longitudinal follow-up of cognitive impairment in patients with HIV infection.
IntroductionMild cognitive impairment has been increasingly recognized as a common feature of chronic HIV infection, even in patients with good viral control on highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) [1]. It occurs in 30-50% of patients, depending on both the cohort under study and how the impairment is identified [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]. The current diagnostic approach is descriptive: HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder (HAND) is termed 'asymptomatic neurocognitive impairment' when found on testing in the absence of symptoms, and 'mild neurocognitive disorder' when both signs and symptoms are present, but are not severe enough to constitute frank dementia [9]. The underlying pathophysiology remains poorly understood [10], posing challenges in the everyday management of these mildly affected patients.How should cognitive impairment be detected in routine practice? Should those found to be affected have their HAART regimen changed, to emphasize antiretrovirals with better central nervous system penetration? Should additional therapies, such as anti-excitotoxic agents or drugs targeting neurodegenerative changes, be added to their treatment? If such changes are made, how should the effects be monitored? The answers to such questions require better tools to assess cognition in HIV-infected individuals. The ideal measure should not only establish the diagnosis, but also quantify the severity of impairment. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-1293.2010.00910.x HIV Medicine (2011 r 2011 British HIV Association
472It should also be free, brief, easy to administer with minimal training by any health professional, and available to clinics where HIV-infected patients receive their care. The present study describes the initial steps in the development of such a method to measure cognition across the intact to mildly impaired ...