2002
DOI: 10.1097/00006254-200211000-00002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antiretroviral Therapy During Pregnancy and the Risk of an Adverse Outcome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

16
99
5
8

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(128 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
16
99
5
8
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding is consistent to what has been reported in a large American cohort of HIV-1 infected women (Tuomala et al 2002) that demonstrated a significant increase in HAART use with and without protease inhibitor from the early 90s to 1998. In the WITS study, HIV-1 vertical transmission rate was 20% for women not receiving prenatal ART 10.4% for those receiving ZDV monotherapy, 3.8% for multi-ART, and 1.2% for HAART (Cooper et al 2002).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This finding is consistent to what has been reported in a large American cohort of HIV-1 infected women (Tuomala et al 2002) that demonstrated a significant increase in HAART use with and without protease inhibitor from the early 90s to 1998. In the WITS study, HIV-1 vertical transmission rate was 20% for women not receiving prenatal ART 10.4% for those receiving ZDV monotherapy, 3.8% for multi-ART, and 1.2% for HAART (Cooper et al 2002).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…7 Our study supports ECS data with respect to preterm labour. We did not confirm a difference neither in preterm delivery rate nor in incidence of pre-eclampsia between women using a PI-containing or a PI-free HAART regime.…”
Section: Commentsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…6 US studies found no association between HAART treatment and preterm delivery, but an increased very low birthweight rate. 7 To explore the relationship between the use and timing of HAART and pregnancy-related disorders, controlling for population characteristics, we compared preterm delivery rate, low birthweight rate and their risk factors, incidence of pre-eclampsia and other obstetric complications in HIVpositive women and HIV-negative matched controls. Further, we explored the safety of vaginal delivery with respect to MTCT under effective HAART treatment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Congenital malformation rates are reported at ∟3% to 6% in HIV-exposed infant cohorts 18,19 but longer periods of observation tend to uncover higher rates of conditions unidentified at birth. 20 One advantage of prospectively managing HIV-exposed infants is the opportunity for multiple diagnostic evaluations, which enable detection of clinical conditions, something that cannot be ascertained through antiretroviral pregnancy registries, as these do not include follow-up for infants. There were a number of SAEs reported in this study that would require additional follow-up time for evaluation of clinical significance and/or potential resolution as there is a paucity of data on long-term pediatric outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%