Antismoking Threat and Efficacy Appeals: Effects on Smoking Cessation Intentions for Smokers with Low and High Readiness to Quit

Abstract

This study examined the effects of sequencing different types of antismoking threat and efficacy appeals on smoking cessation intentions for smokers with low and high levels of readiness to quit. An experiment was done to test predictions based on Witte's (1992) Extended Parallel Process Model and research by Cho and Salmon (2006). A national probability sample of 555 adult smokers was recruited to take part in this study. Results found a positive two-way interaction effect between message threat and perceived level of message efficacy on intentions to seek help for quitting. A three-way interaction effect was found between message threat, perceived level of message efficacy, and readiness to quit on quitting intentions. Both threat and efficacy were important for smokers with low readiness to quit, whereas efficacy was most important among smokers with high readiness to quit. Implications of the results for antismoking campaigns are discussed along with limitations and future directions.

From IT Addiction to Discontinued Use: A Cognitive Dissonance Perspective

“…First, it would be interesting for future research to investigate the role of other plausible antecedent of addiction, such as stress [16], psychological well-being [22], self-awareness [19], response efficacy [54], and moderated use [20], and how they affect SNS use via cognitive dissonancerelated mechanisms. Second, future research can take a deeper look into the effect of self-efficacy on the discontinuance intention, in particular to see if too much of self-efficacy (over-confidence in one's ability to quit addiction) might have negative effects on the discontinuance intentions.…”

Framing Pictorial Cigarette Warning Labels to Motivate Young Smokers to Quit

“…27 The items captured smokers' perceptions that smoking is likely to harm their health, how much they think their health has been harmed by smoking, and the chance of getting a serious smoking-related disease. Responses were based on a five-point Likert-type scale with higher values indicating greater perceived risk.…”

Construct and Predictive Validity of Three Measures of Intention to Quit Smoking: Findings From the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Netherlands Survey

“…Another frequently used method to measure intention to quit smoking is by means of a Likert scale, for example by asking how likely it is that smokers would quit within a specific time frame [15][16][17][18] .…”