2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2006.03.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antisolvent crystallization in porous hollow fiber devices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
69
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
69
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(11) (Zarkadas and Sirkar, 2006) as MSMPR model does not fit well to the population densities calculated (as can be seen from Figs. 1 and 2).…”
Section: Nucleation Rate Determinationmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…(11) (Zarkadas and Sirkar, 2006) as MSMPR model does not fit well to the population densities calculated (as can be seen from Figs. 1 and 2).…”
Section: Nucleation Rate Determinationmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…In addition, the main advantages of membrane crystallization have been already demonstrated: 1) it is possible to control the maximum level of supersaturation due to a defined mass transfer through the membrane [29]; 2) the membrane induces heterogeneous nucleation; 3) size, shape and purity of crystals can be controlled; 4) there is a significant reduction of energy consumption compared to conventional crystallization by means of cooling or evaporation [30]; and 5) comparable or slightly higher nucleation rates with respect to batch crystallizers or tubular precipitators have been obtained [24]. Furthermore, the use of membranes has been already considered to satisfy the requirements established by the "process intensification" strategy [31][32][33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Crystallization of ionic salts [18][19][20], metal ions [21], low molecular organic acids [22][23], proteins and pharmaceutical compounds [24][25][26][27][28] are examples of the applicability of this technology. In addition, the main advantages of membrane crystallization have been already demonstrated: 1) it is possible to control the maximum level of supersaturation due to a defined mass transfer through the membrane [29]; 2) the membrane induces heterogeneous nucleation; 3) size, shape and purity of crystals can be controlled; 4) there is a significant reduction of energy consumption compared to conventional crystallization by means of cooling or evaporation [30]; and 5) comparable or slightly higher nucleation rates with respect to batch crystallizers or tubular precipitators have been obtained [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An advantage of the hollow fiber membrane device is its scale-up ability (Zarkadas and Sirkar, 2006;Charcosset and Fessi, 2005). The flow rates can be easily increased by adding more fibers or using devices in parallel, to achieve the desired conversion rates and productivity (Kieffer et al, 2008).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%