2015
DOI: 10.4236/oji.2015.51005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antitumor Effects and Acute Oral Toxicity Studies of a Plant Extract Mixture Containing <i>Rhus verniciflua</i> and Some Other Herbs

Abstract: A novel antitumor agent was developed from six kinds of herbs containing Rhus verniciflua (Rv-PEM01). The components were traditionally established for each formula for traditional medicine. The formula was designed to affect antitumor effect as well as maintain host immune functions. First, we investigated the antiproliferative activities of Rv-PEM01 on human and canine tumor cell lines in vitro, and on antitumor effects using BALB/cAJcl-nu/nu mice in vivo. Acute oral toxicity of Rv-PEM01 was also investigate… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although this dosage scheme met these criteria, and Rv-PEM01 was well tolerated at these dosages, the dosages used were significantly less than what would be needed to achieve blood concentrations of the active metabolites equivalent to their in vitro IC 50 's. In previous in vivo studies, single oral doses of 5.0 g/kg Rv-PEM01 produced no evidence of acute toxicity in ddY mice, based on clinical observation, body weight change, and organ weights and chronic dosing at a dosage of 2.5 g/kg daily for 28 days was similarly well tolerated [12]. Based on the excellent tolerability of Rv-PEM01 in tumor bearing dogs found in this study, the lack of apparent toxicity in mice when given Rv-PEM01 at much higher doses, and the concentrations of active compounds needed to produce antitumor activity in vitro, further studies of Rv-PEM01 at higher dosages in tumor bearing dogs are recommended.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Although this dosage scheme met these criteria, and Rv-PEM01 was well tolerated at these dosages, the dosages used were significantly less than what would be needed to achieve blood concentrations of the active metabolites equivalent to their in vitro IC 50 's. In previous in vivo studies, single oral doses of 5.0 g/kg Rv-PEM01 produced no evidence of acute toxicity in ddY mice, based on clinical observation, body weight change, and organ weights and chronic dosing at a dosage of 2.5 g/kg daily for 28 days was similarly well tolerated [12]. Based on the excellent tolerability of Rv-PEM01 in tumor bearing dogs found in this study, the lack of apparent toxicity in mice when given Rv-PEM01 at much higher doses, and the concentrations of active compounds needed to produce antitumor activity in vitro, further studies of Rv-PEM01 at higher dosages in tumor bearing dogs are recommended.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Although no evidence of tumor regression was documented in any of the 12 dogs treated, this study was not designed as an efficacy trial, and a potential role for Rv-PEM01 as a complementary or alternative therapy for cancer treatment, or a role in chemoprevention, remains to be explored. Dosages of Rv-PEM01 evaluated here are significantly less than what is needed to produce antiproliferative effects in vitro [11] [12] suggesting that further studies are warranted in dogs at significantly higher dosage levels.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations