Antiviral innate immunity and stress granule responses

Stress granules (SGs) are cytosolic ribonucleoprotein aggregates that are induced during cellular stress. Several viruses modulate SG formation, suggesting that SGs have an impact on virus infection. However, the mechanisms and impact of modulating SG assembly in infected cells are not completely understood. In this study, we identify the dicistrovirus cricket paralysis virus 1A (CrPV-1A) protein that functions to inhibit SG assembly during infection. Moreover, besides inhibiting RNA interference, CrPV-1A also inhibits host transcription, which indirectly modulates SG assembly. Thus, CrPV-1A is a multifunctional protein. We identify a key R146A residue that is responsible for these effects, and mutant CrPV(R146A) virus infection is attenuated in Drosophila melanogaster S2 cells and adult fruit flies and results in increased SG formation. Treatment of CrPV(R146A)-infected cells with actinomycin D, which represses transcription, restores SG assembly suppression and viral yield. In summary, CrPV-1A modulates several cellular processes to generate a cellular environment that promotes viral translation and replication.IMPORTANCE RNA viruses encode a limited set of viral proteins to modulate an array of cellular processes in order to facilitate viral replication and inhibit antiviral defenses. In this study, we identified a viral protein, called CrPV-1A, within the dicistrovirus cricket paralysis virus that can inhibit host transcription, modulate viral translation, and block a cellular process called stress granule assembly. We also identified a specific amino acid within CrPV-1A that is important for these cellular processes and that mutant viruses containing mutations of CrPV-1A attenuate virus infection. We also demonstrate that the CrPV-1A protein can also modulate cellular processes in human cells, suggesting that the mode of action of CrPV-1A is conserved. We propose that CrPV-1A is a multifunctional, versatile protein that creates a cellular environment in virus-infected cells that permits productive virus infection.

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Disruption of Stress Granule Formation by the Multifunctional Cricket Paralysis Virus 1A Protein

Khong

Kerr

Yeung

et al. 2017

“…This translational arrest is mediated by the phosphorylation of the ␣ subunit of eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2 (eIF2␣) by one of four cytoplasmic kinases that sense distinct types of environmental stress (17). Most important for the response to viral infection is protein kinase R (PKR), which senses double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) and also serves as a critical component of type I IFN production (18)(19)(20). Additionally, heme-regulated inhibitor kinase (HRI) senses oxidative stress, PKR-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase (PERK) monitors ER stress, and general control nonderepressible 2 (GCN2) responds to nutrient deprivation.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Ebola Virus Does Not Induce Stress Granule Formation during Infection and Sequesters Stress Granule Proteins within Viral Inclusions

Nelson

Schmidt

Deflubé

et al. 2016

A hallmark of Ebola virus (EBOV) infection is the formation of viral inclusions in the cytoplasm of infected cells. These viral in-clusions contain the EBOV nucleocapsids and are sites of viral replication and nucleocapsid maturation. Although there is growing evidence that viral inclusions create a protected environment that fosters EBOV replication, little is known about their role in the host response to infection. The cellular stress response is an effective antiviral strategy that leads to stress granule (SG) formation and translational arrest mediated by the phosphorylation of a translation initiation factor, the ␣ subunit of eukaryotic initiation factor 2 (eIF2␣). Here, we show that selected SG proteins are sequestered within EBOV inclusions, where they form distinct granules that colocalize with viral RNA. These inclusion-bound (IB) granules are functionally and structurally different from canonical SGs. Formation of IB granules does not indicate translational arrest in the infected cells. We further show that EBOV does not induce formation of canonical SGs or eIF2␣ phosphorylation at any time postinfection but is unable to fully inhibit SG formation induced by different exogenous stressors, including sodium arsenite, heat, and hippuristanol. Despite the sequestration of SG marker proteins into IB granules, canonical SGs are unable to form within inclusions, which we propose might be mediated by a novel function of VP35, which disrupts SG formation. This function is independent of VP35's RNA binding activity. Further studies aim to reveal the mechanism for SG protein sequestration and precise function within inclusions. IMPORTANCEAlthough progress has been made developing antiviral therapeutics and vaccines against the highly pathogenic Ebola virus (EBOV), the cellular mechanisms involved in EBOV infection are still largely unknown. To better understand these intracellular events, we investigated the cellular stress response, an antiviral pathway manipulated by many viruses. We show that EBOV does not induce formation of stress granules (SGs) in infected cells and is therefore unrestricted by their concomitant translational arrest. We identified SG proteins sequestered within viral inclusions, which did not impair protein translation. We further show that EBOV is unable to block SG formation triggered by exogenous stress early in infection. These findings provide insight into potential targets of therapeutic intervention. Additionally, we identified a novel function of the interferon antagonist VP35, which is able to disrupt SG formation.

“…They form in eukaryotic cells in response to a variety of environmental stress conditions, including viral infections (10). The first step in the signaling cascade leading to SG assembly is the phosphorylation of eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2␣ (eIF2␣), which can be regulated by any of the four serine/threonine kinases, namely, double-stranded RNA-dependent protein kinase R (PKR), hemeregulated translation inhibitor kinase (HRI), PKR-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase (PERK) and general control nonderepressible 2 (GCN2) (11)(12)(13).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Many viruses induce SGs through the activation of PKR kinase and in some cases GCN2 by detection of viral RNA in the cytoplasm (24,25). Most viruses, including influenza A virus, have mechanisms to inhibit SG formation, implicating the antiviral role of SGs in virus life cycle (10). In case of influenza viruses, NS1 protein is known to inhibit PKR, thereby preventing eIF2␣ phosphorylation and SG formation (26).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

DDX3 Interacts with Influenza A Virus NS1 and NP Proteins and Exerts Antiviral Function through Regulation of Stress Granule Formation

Raman

Liu

Pyo

et al. 2016

DDX3 belongs to the DEAD box RNA helicase family and is a multifunctional protein affecting the life cycle of a variety of viruses. However, its role in influenza virus infection is unknown. In this study, we explored the potential role of DDX3 in influenza virus life cycle and discovered that DDX3 is an antiviral protein. Since many host proteins affect virus life cycle by interacting with certain components of the viral machinery, we first verified whether DDX3 has any viral interaction partners. Immunoprecipitation studies revealed NS1 and NP as direct interaction partners of DDX3. Stress granules (SGs) are known to be antiviral and do form in influenza virus-infected cells expressing defective NS1 protein. Additionally, a recent study showed that DDX3 is an important SG-nucleating factor. We thus explored whether DDX3 plays a role in influenza virus infection through regulation of SGs. Our results showed that SGs were formed in infected cells upon infection with a mutant influenza virus lacking functional NS1 (del NS1) protein, and DDX3 colocalized with NP in SGs. We further determined that the DDX3 helicase domain did not interact with NS1 and NP; however, it was essential for DDX3 localization in virus-induced SGs. Knockdown of DDX3 resulted in impaired SG formation and led to increased virus titers. Taken together, our results identified DDX3 as an antiviral protein with a role in virus-induced SG formation. IMPORTANCEDDX3 is a multifunctional RNA helicase and has been reported to be involved in regulating various virus life cycles. However, its function during influenza A virus infection remains unknown. In this study, we demonstrated that DDX3 is capable of interacting with influenza virus NS1 and NP proteins; DDX3 and NP colocalize in the del NS1 virus-induced SGs. Furthermore, knockdown of DDX3 impaired SG formation and led to a decreased virus titer. Thus, we provided evidence that DDX3 is an antiviral protein during influenza virus infection and its antiviral activity is through regulation of SG formation. Our findings provide knowledge about the function of DDX3 in the influenza virus life cycle and information for future work on manipulating the SG pathway and its components to fight influenza virus infection.