2010
DOI: 10.14430/arctic425
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antler Mass of Barren-Ground Caribou Relative to Body Condition and Pregnancy Rate

Abstract: ABSTRACT. Antlers of caribou (Rangifer tarandus) likely contribute to breeding success of males, defence of feeding sites by females, and recognition of the hierarchical status of conspecifics. However, few data are available on how antler mass is related to age, body mass, fat reserves, other physical indices, and reproduction. Mass of antlers was recorded for 958 caribou obtained in early and late winter, 1982 through 1987, from the Beverly herd of barren-ground caribou (R. t. groenlandicus) in north-central… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On this basis, the antler characteristics in reindeer populations have been recognised as a proxy of the population conditions, with certain limitations discussed later. Similar conclusion has also been reported by Thomas and Barry (2005) using the antler mass as a proxy of conditions for each individual.…”
Section: Antlerssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On this basis, the antler characteristics in reindeer populations have been recognised as a proxy of the population conditions, with certain limitations discussed later. Similar conclusion has also been reported by Thomas and Barry (2005) using the antler mass as a proxy of conditions for each individual.…”
Section: Antlerssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The antler size seems obviously dependent on age, too. There has been observed an overall positive correlation between age and antler size (Thomas and Barry, 2005), with the maximum antler size at an age of about 14-16 years. Therefore, our results reflect both the population fitness and the population age structure.…”
Section: Differences Between the Populationsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Pregnancy is largely a factor of autumn weight/body condition [26,27,51]. Pregnancy rate (95% confidence interval = 76–88%) was slightly lower than what would be expected for a healthy, increasing herd (~90%) [44,5254]. Given the Western Arctic Herd’s high population size and decade-long decline, the lower pregnancy rate is not unexpected [27,55].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inability of the GLM models to account for decreased antler size may reflect the current nutritional conditions for males (i.e., conditions in year of harvest) rather than conditions in the year of birth. In elk, for example, antler mass appears indicative of prevailing foraging conditions while they are growing (Smith, 1998) and in male caribou, antler mass (but not the number of tines) varies in concert with body mass (Markusson & Folstad, 1997;Thomas & Barry, 2005). In addition, overgrazing may have created foraging conditions that are a cumulative result of past foraging activity and not directly related to current population abundance or climate conditions (Henry & Gunn, 1991).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In sum, our study points to diminished body size, in these and other large insular Newfoundland herds (Mahoney, 2000;Mahoney & Schaefer, 2002; S. Mahoney and J. Schaefer, unpublished data), as a phenotypic consequence of high abundance and large-scale climate patterns, likely mediated by nutrition. Jawbone size and antler or horn quality are highly sensitive to variation in nutrient quality and availability (Suttie & Kay, 1982;Suttie & Mitchell, 1983;Gordon et al, 2004;Høye & Forchhammer, 2006) and are frequently used as proxies of range quality and condition (Nugent & Frampton, 1994;Hewison & Gaillard, 2001;Schmidt et al, 2001;Keyser et al, 2005;Thomas & Barry, 2005;Weladji et al, 2005;Høye & Forchhammer, 2006). Beyond morphology, other ecological features of Newfoundland caribou coincide with their dramatic numerical fluctuations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%