2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2018.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anxiety and feedback processing in a gambling task: Contributions of time-frequency theta and delta

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Delta‐RewP activity did not differentiate between outcome valence until the new sequence was established (i.e., the second trial of the same outcome). While our general finding that gains generated more Delta‐RewP aligns with previous reports from our group as well as others (Bernat et al., 2008, 2011, 2015; Bowers et al., 2018; Cohen et al., 2007; Ellis et al., 2018; Nelson et al., 2011; Watts et al., 2017; Watts & Bernat, 2018), the finding of a non‐significant difference in Delta‐RewP activity between gain and loss outcomes during the change trial is worth special consideration. Delta‐RewP has consistently been shown to be larger for gains relative to losses, but these prior studies would not have suggested such a lack of gain‐loss differences on the change trial.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Delta‐RewP activity did not differentiate between outcome valence until the new sequence was established (i.e., the second trial of the same outcome). While our general finding that gains generated more Delta‐RewP aligns with previous reports from our group as well as others (Bernat et al., 2008, 2011, 2015; Bowers et al., 2018; Cohen et al., 2007; Ellis et al., 2018; Nelson et al., 2011; Watts et al., 2017; Watts & Bernat, 2018), the finding of a non‐significant difference in Delta‐RewP activity between gain and loss outcomes during the change trial is worth special consideration. Delta‐RewP has consistently been shown to be larger for gains relative to losses, but these prior studies would not have suggested such a lack of gain‐loss differences on the change trial.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…However, we found that this measure was insensitive to the establishment of a new sequence. This is consistent with work suggesting theta responds to more simple and primary attributes of outcome stimuli, relative to delta which appears additionally sensitive to secondary and more evaluative stimulus attributes (Bernat et al, 2008(Bernat et al, , 2011(Bernat et al, , 2015Bowers et al, 2018;Cohen et al, 2007;Ellis et al, 2018;Nelson et al, 2011;Watts et al, 2017;.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…LF regressions (Tables 5 and 6) revealed that delta-FN/P3 effects were accounted for by delta-P3/SW, but theta-FN was a unique predictor of SB. In a relevant study with anxious participants during a gambling task, delta-FN, a component of interest in the gambling task (Ellis et al, 2018), accounted for a majority of the effects. Although we see similar delta and theta effects to that study, the delta-P3/SW measure identified in this study accounts for the delta effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, while it was traditionally posited as a relatively low-level response to negative outcomes, recent research using TF analysis has revealed that the FN is comprised of two overlapping parts: (1) a negativegoing, loss-sensitive theta signal, and (2) a positive-going, gain-sensitive delta signal (Bernat et al, 2011;Bernat et al, 2015;Yeung, 2004). The ability to separate these pieces has been critical in understanding how different aspects of feedback processing relate to psychopathology such as anxiety (Ellis et al, 2018) and externalizing disorders (Bernat et al, 2011). Importantly, while the FN is the primary component typically assessed in feedback paradigms, recent research has shown that early attention orienting and later low wave activity maybe implicated as well (Ellis et al, 2018).…”
Section: Time-frequency Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theta rhythms increase in amplitude with signals of novelty (Harper et al, 2017 ), negative feedback (Ellis et al, 2018 ), conflict (Cohen & Donner, 2013 ; Neo et al, 2011 ; Pinner & Cavanagh, 2017 ) and error (Cohen, 2011 ; Pasion & Barbosa, 2019 ; Yeung et al, 2004 ; Zavala et al, 2016 ). These different activations may reflect a fundamental control process that is generally required when internal or external goals are changing, and require attention and monitoring (Cohen, 2014 ; McLoughlin et al, 2021 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%