Anxiety and Learning in Dynamic and Static Clock Game Experiments

Abstract

In clock games, agents receive differently-timed private signals when an asset value is above its fundamental. The price crashes to the fundamental when K of N agents have decided to sell. If selling decisions are private, bubbles can be sustained because people delay selling, after receiving signals, knowing that others will delay too. Our results replicate the main features of the one previous experimental study of clock game (in two subject pools): Selling delays are shorter than predicted, but converge toward equilibrium predictions over repeated trials. We also find that delays are shorter in a dynamic game in which selling decisions unfold over time, compared to a static equivalent in which subjects precommit to selling decisions. A model of learning with growing anxiety after signal arrival can reproduce the empirical observations of shorter-than-predicted delay, smaller delay after later signal arrival, and shorter delays in dynamic games.

Waiting to Choose: The Role of Deliberation in Intertemporal Choice

“…Another line of work looks at the choice to wait in dynamic games(Kang et al, 2010). In these settings, however, the incentive to wait has to do with the potential exogenous arrival of decision-relevant information, e.g.…”