Anxiety and perceptual-motor performance: toward an integrated model of concepts, mechanisms, and processes

Abstract

Under anxiety, people sometimes perform poorly. This concerns cognitive performance (e.g., taking an important exam) as well as perceptual-motor performance (e.g., picking up a cup from a table). There is still much debate about how anxiety affects perceptual-motor performance. In the current paper we review the experimental literature on anxiety and perceptual-motor performance, thereby focusing on how anxiety affects the perception, selection, and realization of action possibilities. Based on this review we discuss the merits of two opposing theoretical explanations and build on existing frameworks of anxiety and cognitive performance to develop an integrated model that explains the various ways in which anxiety may specifically affect perceptual-motor performance. This model distinguishes between positive and negative effects of anxiety and, moving beyond previous approaches, recognizes three operational levels (i.e., attentional, interpretational, and behavioral) at which anxiety may affect different aspects of goal-directed action. Finally, predictions are formulated and directions for future research suggested.

Evaluation of Examination Stress and Its Effect on Cognitive Function among First Year Medical Students

“…These findings are in contradiction with other authors who have reported decreased ART prior to examination [16]. Our findings slightly related to integrated model which is strongly based on distraction model [17]. Study also reported that under stressful conditions, the cognitive system is overloaded thereby it reduces a person's attentional resources [18].…”

Choking interventions in sports: A systematic review

“…The distraction and self-focus models of choking have been initially viewed as two distinct or competing models (e.g., Beilock & Carr, 2001;Lewis & Linder, 1997). Most recently, however, researchers have begun to suggest that the two choking models are not distinct but may overlap (Gröpel & Beckmann, 2017b;Mesagno, Geukes, et al, 2015;Nieuwenhuys & Oudejans, 2012). For example, Nieuwenhuys and Oudejans argue that self-focus may be viewed as a type of internal distraction.…”

Implementing the Five-A Model of Technical Refinement: Key Roles of the Sport Psychologist

“…In such cases, exploiting already existing levels of automaticity to better establish the skill under anxiety conditions , as opposed to refining technique, might be a more appropriate solution (see Schack & Bar-Eli, 2007). Of course, it is entirely possible that several interrelated factors may act to mediate suboptimal performance (e.g., Nieuwenhuys & Oudejans, 2012), so focusing on the demonstrably important (i.e., causative as opposed to associated) contributor(s) are essential. Furthermore, depending on the presenting circumstances (e.g., time relative to a competitive season, availability of resources), shortterm trade-off decisions that provide immediate relief may be more appropriate, retaining the intention of conducting more extensive work later on.…”