1968
DOI: 10.1037/h0025609
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anxiety as a function of taking the MMPI.

Abstract: To investigate anxiety produced by taking a personality test, 44 college Ss were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 groups: a control group which wrote an essay, "Who Am I?"; a group which took an elementary form of an achievement test (ITBS) and then wrote the essay; and a group which took a personality inventory (MMPI) and then wrote the essay. Content analysis, employing the General Inquirer System, reduced the essays to quantitative tag-specific concepts which disclosed statistically reliable differences on 21 of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1974
1974
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the early 1960s, the first formalized, computer-automated method for text analysis in the social sciences made its debut in the form of the Harvard General Inquirer (Stone et al, 1962), a complex system intended to surpass various human shortcomings that plagued manual efforts at text analysis. The General Inquirer was recognized instantly for its incredible potential; widespread enthusiasm over its adoption spread throughout virtually every social science, including political science (Brody et al, 1965), education (Bhushan & Ginther, 1968), anthropology and sociology (McClelland et al, 1966), and psychotherapy (Miller et al, 1968). However, the system quickly fell out of favor, with commonly cited pitfalls being its cost, complexity and difficulty of use, and a perceived failure to harmonize with established theory and practitioners of content analysis in its day (Kadushin et al, 1968;Psathas, 1969).…”
Section: Behavioral Theory and The Psychological Meaning Of Languagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the early 1960s, the first formalized, computer-automated method for text analysis in the social sciences made its debut in the form of the Harvard General Inquirer (Stone et al, 1962), a complex system intended to surpass various human shortcomings that plagued manual efforts at text analysis. The General Inquirer was recognized instantly for its incredible potential; widespread enthusiasm over its adoption spread throughout virtually every social science, including political science (Brody et al, 1965), education (Bhushan & Ginther, 1968), anthropology and sociology (McClelland et al, 1966), and psychotherapy (Miller et al, 1968). However, the system quickly fell out of favor, with commonly cited pitfalls being its cost, complexity and difficulty of use, and a perceived failure to harmonize with established theory and practitioners of content analysis in its day (Kadushin et al, 1968;Psathas, 1969).…”
Section: Behavioral Theory and The Psychological Meaning Of Languagementioning
confidence: 99%