2021
DOI: 10.1101/2021.10.30.21265692
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anxiety-impulsivity subtypes in adolescent internalizing disorder are characterized by distinguishable neurodevelopmental, neurocognitive and clinical trajectory signatures

Abstract: Background Anxiety and impulsivity represent transdiagnostic pathology dimensions yet their interaction and contribution to emotional disorders in adolescence and to disease development remain controversial, and previous studies indicate heterogeneity within the broad category of internalizing disorders. Methods A combination of hierarchical and non-hierarchical clustering strategies was employed to determine impulsivity-related subtypes (based on the facets of negative urgency, lack of planning, lack of per… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 94 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Kaczkurkin and colleagues (2020) [20] identified two neuroanatomical subtypes in youth (aged 8-23 years) with internalising disorders broadly corresponding to an "impaired" and a "spared" group. A similar spared-impaired pattern was reported by Fan and colleagues (2021) [21] who used data-driven methods to distinguish 9-10-year-olds with internalizing disorders into two subgroups with either high or low impulsivity and then contrasted their neuroanatomical profiles.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Kaczkurkin and colleagues (2020) [20] identified two neuroanatomical subtypes in youth (aged 8-23 years) with internalising disorders broadly corresponding to an "impaired" and a "spared" group. A similar spared-impaired pattern was reported by Fan and colleagues (2021) [21] who used data-driven methods to distinguish 9-10-year-olds with internalizing disorders into two subgroups with either high or low impulsivity and then contrasted their neuroanatomical profiles.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 74%