2022
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2201.11562
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anyon braiding and the renormalization group

Abstract: A braiding operation defines a real-space renormalization group for anyonic chains. The resulting renormalization group flow can be used to define a quantum scaling limit by operator-algebraic renormalization. It is illustrated how this works for the Ising chain, also known as transverse-field Ising model. In this case, the quantum scaling limit results in the vacuum state of the well-known Ising CFT. Distinguishing between the braiding and its inverse is directly related to the chiral sectors of the Ising CFT… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We next observe that both in fig. 44 46, we have summations over ONBs p1 ρ 1 ˆf1 qf 1 1 , p1 ν 1 ˆf2 qf 1 2 , e 11 pe 1 ˆ1ν 1 q, e 12 pe 2 ˆ1ρ 1 q respectively their adjoints. By unitarity of the 6j-symbols we can switch to ONBs of the form pf 1 ˆ1λ 1…”
Section: ) Consider the Operatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We next observe that both in fig. 44 46, we have summations over ONBs p1 ρ 1 ˆf1 qf 1 1 , p1 ν 1 ˆf2 qf 1 2 , e 11 pe 1 ˆ1ν 1 q, e 12 pe 2 ˆ1ρ 1 q respectively their adjoints. By unitarity of the 6j-symbols we can switch to ONBs of the form pf 1 ˆ1λ 1…”
Section: ) Consider the Operatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[19,27]. There is evidence in special models that the algebra generated by the e x can be identified with a product of left-and right-moving Virasoro algebras in a suitable conformal scaling limit of the chain, see [27,44] which uses ideas by [45].…”
Section: Inclusions Of Von Neumann Algebras and Anyonic Chainsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 44. we have a description of (B + ) ∩ B + in terms of the objects A ∈ M X M ; more precisely for each A one can construct in a canonical way a minimal projectionp A ∈ (B + ) ∩ B + .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%