2012
DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivs510
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aortic arch reconstruction in newborns with an autologous pericardial patch: contemporary results

Abstract: The use of autologous pericardium in aortic arch reconstruction procedure is effective and associated with an acceptable incidence of recurrent arch obstruction. Its availability and characteristics make it an attractive alternative to other materials.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
34
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
34
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In their series, re-coarctation occurs in certain cases especially who received autologous pericardium during initial arch repair. 15 Bernabei et al 16 used gluteraldehyde-treated autologous pericardium in their cases for aortic arch repair, and they faced with re-stenosis in some of their cases. Their attempt was to balloon dilate the stenosed arches primarily; however, unsuccessful cases were surgically treated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In their series, re-coarctation occurs in certain cases especially who received autologous pericardium during initial arch repair. 15 Bernabei et al 16 used gluteraldehyde-treated autologous pericardium in their cases for aortic arch repair, and they faced with re-stenosis in some of their cases. Their attempt was to balloon dilate the stenosed arches primarily; however, unsuccessful cases were surgically treated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They detected an overgrowth of neo-intima to be responsible for the progressive lumen narrowing. 16 In our series, fresh or short-duration gluteraldehyde-treated autologous pericardial materials were used for the treatment of aortic interruption. We faced with pericardial roll dilatation in patients who received fresh tissues both of which presumed to result due to decreased strength of the material at the aortic position as well as additional proximal anastomosis stenosis in one (submitted elsewhere) who was further operated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast, the reconstruction of the aortic arch is still a challenging part of the Norwood procedure, since recoarctation of the aorta is known to be significantly related to increased morbidity and mortality . Several patch materials such as autologous pericardium, porcine intestinal submucosa, bovine pericardium, and extracellular matrix‐based scaffolds and pulmonary homografts with different geometric designs have been described to achieve the best results in terms of hemodynamics and growth potential . Several advantages and disadvantages of the currently used materials are known and there is no consensus about an ideal patch material for the arch repair in Norwood procedure.…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rate of neoaortic arch reintervention in our study cohort was 11.4% (five reinterventions in 3 patients), lower when compared with several recent published reports. In 2012, Bernabei and colleagues [18] reported an aortic arch reintervention rate of 28.2% after Norwood palliation with the use of autologous pericardial material. A recent report from our institution, from January 2008 to December 2013, demonstrated recurrent arch obstruction in 14% of patients after Norwood palliation with an equal number of patients having homograft and PSIS patch material for arch reconstruction.…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 99%