1995
DOI: 10.1177/026765919501000310
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aortic cannula velocimetry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To our knowledge, changes in the rotational component of aortic blood flow during cardiopulmonary bypass have not been reported previously, and these 715 cm/s. 29 This high-velocity jet not only causes the blast effect on the aortic wall but also generates a transverse component of velocity, hence establishing rotational flow, as shown in our study. We demonstrated that the mean transverse velocity during cardiopulmonary bypass was between 35 and 42 cm/s.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…To our knowledge, changes in the rotational component of aortic blood flow during cardiopulmonary bypass have not been reported previously, and these 715 cm/s. 29 This high-velocity jet not only causes the blast effect on the aortic wall but also generates a transverse component of velocity, hence establishing rotational flow, as shown in our study. We demonstrated that the mean transverse velocity during cardiopulmonary bypass was between 35 and 42 cm/s.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…24 However, it does mean that the results of our study need to be interpreted as being at the lower end of the velocity profile for each cannula, as studies have determined the peak velocity exiting cannulae may be up to 45% higher during pulsatile flow. 18 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Groom et al performed in vitro velocimetry measurements during perfusion with 5 aortic cannulae at the exit site within a cast of a human aorta attached to a mock circulatory loop. 15 They demonstrated that the cannula designed with lateral windows and a dispersing cone produced a lower velocity and less concentrated flow pattern at the cannula exit and warned that the use of pulsatile flow doubled the velocity at the cannula exit, which could present a higher risk of atheroembolism generation in patients with atherosclerotic disease in the ascending aorta. Unfortunately, despite using a cannula with lateral windows for the patient who had atheromatous plaque in the distal aorta (Case 3), we could not prevent the plaque rupture.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%