1996
DOI: 10.1016/s1010-7940(96)80298-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aortic root replacement with a composite graft*Factors influencing immediate and long-term results

Abstract: From April 73 to June 94, 203 patients (167 men, 36 women) aged from 10 to 74 years (mean: 44.8 +/- 15) underwent ascending aortic replacement with composite graft for: dystrophic aneurysm (AN) (130 cases, 64.5%), chronic dissection (CD) (35 cases, 17.2%), type A acute dissection (AD) (38 cases, 18.7%). Forty-six patients (22.6%) suffered from Marfan syndrome (24 AN, 13 AD, 9 CD). Thirty patients (14.7%) had undergone a previous cardiac or aortic operation. The ascending aortic replacement was extended to the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

5
51
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Bentall procedure using a button technique for aortic root replacement is safe and durable with a low mortality rate and high reoperation-free rate in patients with dystrophic aneurysm or Marfan syndrome. 7,8 In the present patient, Bentall operation using button technique should have been performed initially; however, only a few reports have described reoperation after the Bentall procedure for aortitis syndrome. 9,10 In patients with the aortitis syndrome, the potential risk of anastomotic dehiscence is much higher than in patients with dystrophic aneurysm or Marfan syndrome, even in the inactive phase of the inflammation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Bentall procedure using a button technique for aortic root replacement is safe and durable with a low mortality rate and high reoperation-free rate in patients with dystrophic aneurysm or Marfan syndrome. 7,8 In the present patient, Bentall operation using button technique should have been performed initially; however, only a few reports have described reoperation after the Bentall procedure for aortitis syndrome. 9,10 In patients with the aortitis syndrome, the potential risk of anastomotic dehiscence is much higher than in patients with dystrophic aneurysm or Marfan syndrome, even in the inactive phase of the inflammation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Either Cabrol's technique or Piehler's technique must be used when the Carrel or original Bentall reimplantation is not feasible; for example, during redo procedures. 7,10 In the present patient, redo graft replacement of the ascending aorta was chosen instead of reimplantation of a new composite valved graft because of the fragile aortic root and it was a simpler procedure. The translocated Bentall procedure may be an alternative technique for composite graft detachment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The graft is attached to the aortic root using an end-to-side technique and to the coronary ostia using an end-to-end technique (5). The mortality rate has been reported to be as high as 20%, which is significantly higher than other aortic repair techniques (6). This may be due to the meticulous nature of the Cabrol procedure and the choice of method for the mobilization and reimplantation of the coronary artery ostia during complex composite graft replacement of the aorta.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aortic root replacement (ARR) is a well-described and highly effective technique for treating aortic root pathologies with excellent long-term outcomes and reported mortality ranging between 4-10% in specialized aortic centers [1][2][3]. Coronary button reimplantation is arguably one of the most challenging aspects of ARR operations, requiring mobilization and reattachment of the coronaries to the root graft.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%