2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(00)02326-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aortic valve replacement in geriatric patients: determinants of in-hospital mortality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
40
1
7

Year Published

2006
2006
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
40
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Operative risk is increased in the setting of comorbidities such as advanced age and others. [23][24][25][26][27] In our patients, judged poor candidates for routine surgery with an estimated logistic Euroscore mortality of 35Ϯ26%, a 30-day mortality rate of 14% is encouraging.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Operative risk is increased in the setting of comorbidities such as advanced age and others. [23][24][25][26][27] In our patients, judged poor candidates for routine surgery with an estimated logistic Euroscore mortality of 35Ϯ26%, a 30-day mortality rate of 14% is encouraging.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Operative risk is increased in the setting of comorbidities, such as advanced age. [22][23][24][25][26] A prior publication from our institution reported aortic valve surgery carried a risk of early mortality of 15.1% for patients 80 to 84 years of age and 17.8% for patients 85 years of age. 27 Mortality at 30 days in this initial percutaneous series of patients with a mean age of 82 years was 11%, which was favorable compared with the Logistic EuroSCORE-predicted surgical mortality rate of 26%.…”
Section: Alternative Therapiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…significant risk to the elderly with multiple medical problems, rendering these patients poor operative candidates. 4 Patients may also be nonsurgical candidates due to marked aortic calcification or previous cardiac surgery. in these individuals, percutaneous AV replacement may become an alternative in the management of aortic stenosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 Surgical aortic valve (AV) replacement is effective in prolonging life and improving symptoms; however, the procedure can be associated with significant perioperative risk, especially in the elderly with decreased functional reserve and multiple co-morbidities. 3,4 Surgery may also carry an unacceptable risk due to extensive calcification of the ascending aorta. Whereas balloon valvuloplasty represents an alternative therapeutic option, the reduction in stenosis is modest and temporary.…”
Section: éLéments Cliniques : Une Fois Le Consentement Du Comité D'étmentioning
confidence: 99%