2021
DOI: 10.1186/s13019-021-01636-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aortic valve replacement in pediatric patients: 30 years single center experience

Abstract: Background The choice of aortic valve replacement needs to be decided in an interdisciplinary approach and together with the patients and their families regarding the need for re-operation and risks accompanying anticoagulation. We report long-term outcomes after different AVR options. Methods A chart review of patients aged < 18 years at time of surgery, who had undergone AVR from May 1985 until April 2020 was conducted. Contraindications for … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For our analysis, we used a conservative estimation of thromboembolic complications in mechanical AVR of 1.5% per year [ 6 ]. However, in a 30-year single-centre retrospective analysis at the University of Vienna, Schlein et al found a considerably higher risk for thromboembolic and bleeding events with a composite linearized event rate per valve-year of 3.2% [ 22 ]. Had our study been based on this event rate, mechanical AVR would not have shown lower adverse events than Ross procedures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For our analysis, we used a conservative estimation of thromboembolic complications in mechanical AVR of 1.5% per year [ 6 ]. However, in a 30-year single-centre retrospective analysis at the University of Vienna, Schlein et al found a considerably higher risk for thromboembolic and bleeding events with a composite linearized event rate per valve-year of 3.2% [ 22 ]. Had our study been based on this event rate, mechanical AVR would not have shown lower adverse events than Ross procedures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Small sizes exist for the pediatric population, and multiple methods have been described to fit larger prostheses into smaller patients via special annular enlargement techniques, such as the Nicks and Manouguian procedures 4–6 . This can be successful in older children, but the smallest commercially available valve of 16 mm is not small enough for many infants and small children despite these efforts 7 . Therefore, mechanical valves do not solve the issue of increased mortality from CHD in infants <1 year of age.…”
Section: Surgical Options For Heart Valve Dysfunction In Neonatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4][5][6] This can be successful in older children, but the smallest commercially available valve of 16 mm is not small enough for many infants and small children despite these efforts. 7 Therefore, mechanical valves do not solve the issue of increased mortality from CHD in infants <1 year of age. Mechanical valves are more durable than some other replacement options such as xenografts.…”
Section: Mechanical Valvesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mechanical valves have the potential to last a lifetime but require chronic anticoagulation, carrying roughly a 1-3% risk of thrombosis or bleeding per valve-year. 43,44 Neither of these valves have potential to grow with the child. Paediatricians can serve as important allies in encouraging adherence to anticoagulation, oral hygiene, and endocarditis prophylaxis recommendations, as non-adherence can rapidly lead to complications including aortic stenosis, aortic insufficiency, and endocarditis.…”
Section: Aortic Stenosismentioning
confidence: 99%