2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2012.06294.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aortocaval fistula: current management strategies

Abstract: Endovascular exclusion appears to be an efficacious means of treating ACF and averting the significant blood loss commonly encountered in conventional repair of these lesions. However, some reviews have suggested equal success with open repair. There is limited available published literature on ACF management and outcome, and likely reporting bias attached to both open and endovascular results that are published. With a randomized controlled trial unlikely to occur, a prospective registry may provide better ou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
49
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
49
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The role of rapidly evolving endovascular modalities has been well documented in the treatment of AAA. The use of these newer techniques in ACF repair has gained favour in more recent years and in selected cases appears to be associated with high success rates although the rarity of the condition and reporting bias for both strategies limit any conclusions from current data regarding a survival advantage [21] . Notwithstanding the limitation of data, a recent systematic review of case reports of endovascular repair of major abdominal arteriovenous fistulas presented a 94% technical success rate and 0% and 10% intra-operative and 90-day mortality respectively [22] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The role of rapidly evolving endovascular modalities has been well documented in the treatment of AAA. The use of these newer techniques in ACF repair has gained favour in more recent years and in selected cases appears to be associated with high success rates although the rarity of the condition and reporting bias for both strategies limit any conclusions from current data regarding a survival advantage [21] . Notwithstanding the limitation of data, a recent systematic review of case reports of endovascular repair of major abdominal arteriovenous fistulas presented a 94% technical success rate and 0% and 10% intra-operative and 90-day mortality respectively [22] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…A preoperative diagnosis allows better haemostatic control and specific care to avoid paradoxical embolism due to dislodged atheromatous debris. Operative mortality is approximately 30% with open surgery due to complications such as haemorrhage, myocardial infarction, coagulopathy and thromboembolism [11,21] . The role of rapidly evolving endovascular modalities has been well documented in the treatment of AAA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aorto-caval fistula resulting from ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm was first described by Syme in 1831. present incidence ranges from 0.2% to 6% of all ruptured aortic aneurysms [1,2]. The classic triad of abdominal pain, pulsatile abdominal mass, and abdominal bruit is found in only 50% to 80% of cases [3].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, reports in the literature show that this event is normally self-limiting. 18 This type of leakage appears to be subject to different dynamics, by which the low pressure of the venous system provides an exit route for retrograde flow from the aortic branches, reduces tension at the aorta wall and facilitates spontaneous resolution. 19 However, some authors suggest that, even after release of the endograft, blood flow into the aneurysm sac may be exacerbated through the fistula, which would require a second procedure to repair.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%