2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00535-021-01823-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

APC mutations are common in adenomas but infrequent in adenocarcinomas of the non-ampullary duodenum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…MSI-H is associated with aggressive tumor behavior in gastric and colorectal cancers and is a poor prognostic factor of colorectal cancer ( 28 , 29 ). Concerning duodenal tumors, several studies showed that genetic mutations (e.g., GNAS , KRAS ) in gastric-type tumors of the stomach were also found in gastric-type tumors of the duodenum ( 30 , 31 ). Particularly, Ishizu et al ( 31 ) reported a low mutation rate of the APC gene in nonpapillary duodenal adenocarcinomas, whereas the mutation rate was high in intestinal-type adenomas, suggesting that common intestinal-type adenomas are not likely major precursors of adenocarcinoma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MSI-H is associated with aggressive tumor behavior in gastric and colorectal cancers and is a poor prognostic factor of colorectal cancer ( 28 , 29 ). Concerning duodenal tumors, several studies showed that genetic mutations (e.g., GNAS , KRAS ) in gastric-type tumors of the stomach were also found in gastric-type tumors of the duodenum ( 30 , 31 ). Particularly, Ishizu et al ( 31 ) reported a low mutation rate of the APC gene in nonpapillary duodenal adenocarcinomas, whereas the mutation rate was high in intestinal-type adenomas, suggesting that common intestinal-type adenomas are not likely major precursors of adenocarcinoma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genetic variation in GNAS is associated with birth weight [11,148]. Mutations in the GNAS gene are frequently observed in a variety of malignant, premalignant, and benign tumors and in tumor-derived organoids and patient-derived xenografts [19,[149][150][151][152][153][154]. This gene has been reported to play an oncogenic role in SCLC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tissue specificity of their imprinting, in addition to variation in gene expression among tissues regulated by mechanisms other than imprinting, underscores the importance of future analyses of associations of allelic dosage, parent-specific allelic expression, and novel types of omics data [3] with drug response, which would need to be conducted in separate tumor categories with large sample sizes. An additional analysis of the mutation status of the imprinted genes in tumors would add further depth to the understanding of their influence on drug response, since protein-changing mutations in many imprinted genes including those genes which were associated with drug response in our study, e.g., NLRP2, CDKN1C, and GNAS, commonly occur in patients with imprinted disorders and/or cancer [1,129,131,[149][150][151][152][153][154]156].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 Only a few studies have been reported that classified SBA into gastric and intestinal types and that examined clinicopathologic differences using immunostaining for phenotype markers. [16][17][18][19] Although immunostaining for CK7/20, CD10, CDX2, and various mucins has already been investigated on their own in a number of SBA studies, there has been no investigation to date that has brought all of these markers under one study for comprehensive analyses. 16,[20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27] More studies are warranted to evaluate these issues through comprehensive analyses of immunohistochemical phenotype markers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our own studies have shown that mutations of APC and CTNNB1 have an inverse relationship with gastric-type markers, but it remains to be determined whether gastric-type and intestinal-type SBAs have different clinicopathologic characteristics 15 . Only a few studies have been reported that classified SBA into gastric and intestinal types and that examined clinicopathologic differences using immunostaining for phenotype markers 16–19 . Although immunostaining for CK7/20, CD10, CDX2, and various mucins has already been investigated on their own in a number of SBA studies, there has been no investigation to date that has brought all of these markers under one study for comprehensive analyses 16,20–27 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%