1997
DOI: 10.1109/23.659031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

APEXRAD: low altitude orbit dose as a function of inclination, magnetic activity and solar cycle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From the APEXRAD mission, Gussenhoven [19] reports the yearly dose accumulation due to trapped protons and electrons to be 18.4 rad(Si) per hemisphere-which means 36.8 rad(Si) all around-for a satellite at 300 km altitude, 60 • inclination, and with 82 mil aluminum shielding. We can use these data to approximate the radiation environment for 200 km altitude and 100 mil shielding.…”
Section: Simulation Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the APEXRAD mission, Gussenhoven [19] reports the yearly dose accumulation due to trapped protons and electrons to be 18.4 rad(Si) per hemisphere-which means 36.8 rad(Si) all around-for a satellite at 300 km altitude, 60 • inclination, and with 82 mil aluminum shielding. We can use these data to approximate the radiation environment for 200 km altitude and 100 mil shielding.…”
Section: Simulation Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, there have been reports that the NASA model might underestimate the dose and the radiation flux at low altitudes [8], [9]. It has also been noted that it is increasingly difficult to make comparisons of applications with AP8 and AE8 models at points more distant in time from the acquisition of the AP8 and AE8 data [8]. It should be interesting in this regard to compare the APEXRAD results with NASA models [8].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…It may not be possible to accurately estimate the geospace radiation environment from the present dose experiment because it involves the conversion model of the threshold voltage change to the accumulated dose and the chord-length estimation has to be precise. Nevertheless, there have been reports that the NASA model might underestimate the dose and the radiation flux at low altitudes [8], [9]. It has also been noted that it is increasingly difficult to make comparisons of applications with AP8 and AE8 models at points more distant in time from the acquisition of the AP8 and AE8 data [8].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Yet the decisive determination of the exact total dose rate, separating the effect of oxide and interface traps from the thermal effects, has not been possible due to the lack of instrument capabilities. [15][16][17] We expect that SSRM can remove these assumptions and limitations and, in turn, improve estimations of the total ionizing dose to compare with the existing models and theories.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%