2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2021.10.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Apically Extruded Debris in Curved Root Canals Using a New Reciprocating Single-File Shaping System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The two systems share the same cross-sectional design characteristic with an off-centered axis of rotation, which explains the outcome of this study. A recent study by Kharouf et al [17] agreed with this result and compared PTN in full rotation and reciprocation with WOG, resulting in no significant difference between the tested files sharing a similar rectangular cross section. Another study by Eliasz et al [36] revealed that PTN and WOG produced the same amount of AED.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…The two systems share the same cross-sectional design characteristic with an off-centered axis of rotation, which explains the outcome of this study. A recent study by Kharouf et al [17] agreed with this result and compared PTN in full rotation and reciprocation with WOG, resulting in no significant difference between the tested files sharing a similar rectangular cross section. Another study by Eliasz et al [36] revealed that PTN and WOG produced the same amount of AED.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…This study has some limitations. Here, X-ray was used to detect the roots if they have single canals instead of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), as mentioned in a previous study [40]. The shear force applied did not simulate (compression, tensile, shear) forces and their directions inside the oral cavity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such debris, in addition to increasing postoperative pain, are capable of producing a detrimental effect on the stem cells of the apical area [ 30 ]. In the study of Alnassar I [ 31 ] in 2021, it was concluded that manual instruments produced more debris than rotary instruments such as Protaper Next Waveone, without finding significant differences between both; [ 32 ] In the recent study by Yeung W-Y [ 33 ] 2022, the cross-sectional area of the instrument used was analyzed as one of the main parameters in determining the amount of extruded debris. In addition, it was also concluded that the volume of irrigant could condition said extrusion since a greater volume of irrigation will notably reduce the extrusion of the material.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%