WE read with interest the recent manuscript from Lowes et al. (1), published in Cytometry A, reporting on the developing and optimizing protocols for the characterization of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) on the CellSearch platform for two proteins of interest, CD44 and M-30.We totally agree with the authors that appropriate steps must be taken for proper optimization of user-defined protein marker assays on this system and this paper undertakes the laudable effort of defining a working method.However, we have significant issues with the overall study design and the conclusions derived from this study.A major concern regards the fact that the optimization experiments have been conducted on spiked samples only, without any further validation in ex vivo samples.To detect tumor cells in peripheral blood, a general consensus exists that an optimal immunocytochemical method has to fulfill specific criteria, including, among others, proven clinical significance. To prove the clinical significance of a new method for tumor cell detection and characterization, this should be optimized in a pilot set of patients (2).The CellSearch platform is a closed system that uses cytokeratin (CK) 8, 18, and 19 to identify tumor cells of epithelial origin. The widespread distribution of these keratins makes them useful markers for the great majority of carcinomas arising from simple epithelia.At single cell level, the cytoplasmic CK staining can be strong and evenly distributed; more often, CK expression patterns are heterogeneous, with strongly-and weakly-stained parts (3,4) asymmetrically distributed. Similarly, the expression of M30, a neo-epitope in CK18 that becomes available at a caspase cleavage event during apoptosis (4), is heterogeneous as well.We were therefore disappointed by the study design pursued by Lowes et al. who, by assuming that M30 expression in an in vitro drug-conditioned cell line (usually showing high intensity CK-staining) would equal that of CTCs coming from a patient sample, limited the integrated assay optimization steps to cell lines (added to normal donor blood) only, and evaluated the percentage of M30-positive CTCs as the only mean to determine M30 monoclonal Antibody (mAb) suitability with the CellSearch system. To support such broad conclusions about the suitability of M30 in conjunction with the CellSearch system in cancer patients, samples representing more than one kind of cancer should have been tested.To meet this criterion, when we customized M30 CTC assay, we started from cell lines spiked into whole blood samples, but afterwards we studied M30 expression on CTCs in a group of 122 patients affected by different kind of tumors, namely breast, colorectal, and renal cancer (4).Overall, the results of this study by the CellSearch platform showed that 64 (52%) cancer patients had at least one CTC, and 56 (87.5%) CTCs-positive patients had one or more M30-positive CTCs (4). These data were consistent with the results obtained by different methods, by which apoptotic CTCs were detected in breast (5...