1978
DOI: 10.1007/bf00795805
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Apparatus for measuring the specific heat of powders at temperatures from 4.3 to 300�K

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The heat capacity (C p ) was measured by the pulse quasi-adiabatic method for the YB 12 tricrystal in the range 2.5-70 K, for the LuB 12 single crystal in the range 0.6-70 K and for the LuB 12 powder sample from 4.3 to 300 K using respectively two types of calorimeter (for compact samples and for the powder one) which have been described in detail in [14,15]. The YB 12 heat capacity below 6 K was measured also in a magnetic field of 1 T assuming the possibility of the superconductive transition in YB 12 at 4.7 K [2].…”
Section: Samples and Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The heat capacity (C p ) was measured by the pulse quasi-adiabatic method for the YB 12 tricrystal in the range 2.5-70 K, for the LuB 12 single crystal in the range 0.6-70 K and for the LuB 12 powder sample from 4.3 to 300 K using respectively two types of calorimeter (for compact samples and for the powder one) which have been described in detail in [14,15]. The YB 12 heat capacity below 6 K was measured also in a magnetic field of 1 T assuming the possibility of the superconductive transition in YB 12 at 4.7 K [2].…”
Section: Samples and Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mass of the LuB 12 powder sample was about 25 g, and the masses of the zone-melted YB 12 and LuB 12 samples were less than 400 mg. The experimental error of the C p study by a copper standard for the calorimeter with the compact samples is less than 1% in the 0.6 ± 70 K range [14]; in the case of the calorimeter for the powder sample the experimental error compared to a leucosapphire standard is equal to 1.46% in the range 4.3 ± 30 K, 0.53% at 30 ± 100 K, and 0.31% at 100 ± 300 K [15].…”
Section: Samples and Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%