Apparel Manufacturers' Perceptions of Supplier-Retailer Relationships

Abstract

Structural changes occurring in the U.S. softgoods industry have had a significant impact on manufacturer-retailer relationships. The present study examines certain aspects of these relationships within the context of theory and earlier work on channel relationships. In this study 70% of Missouri's population of apparel producers responded to a survey designed to examine apparel manufacturers' perceptions of working relationships with retailers. Results indicated that larger, more active companies appeared to have less difficulty in their relationships with retail customers than have their smaller, less active counterparts. Manufacturing firms that direct a large proportion of their production to mass merchandisers reported fewer problems in working with mass merchandisers than suppliers directing less of their production to those outlets. Manufacturers relied most heavily on traveling market representatives to establish and maintain retail accounts. Apparel producers saw lower prices and improved products and services (particularly Quick Response) as the primary means of improving their company's ability to market to U.S. retailers. Implications for the softgoods industry and for educators are considered

Supply Chain Strategies for Quality Inspection under a Customer Return Policy: A Game Theoretical Approach

“…Present global supply chain networks consist of numerous enterprises linked together through a complex interplay of products and services, consistently work to improve the supply chain effectiveness and decision making to sustain an advantage against the competition generated by growing number of industries [34,35]. In this context, mathematical models coupled with behavior and organizational theories provide a sound framework for practices and decision-making in complex networks of collaborating enterprises [27][28][29][30]. Since the supply chain consists of multiple enterprises integrated by some common goals but having different constraints and conflicting objectives, these enterprises can be seen as players in a game [36][37][38].…”

“…In the textile supply chain, there exists a dynamic field of conflicting and cooperative objectives in the supplier-retailer relation [30]. Cooperation is described as a favored situation benefitting the whole supply chain [30,47], however, when the conflicting interests of actors outweigh the cooperating interests, the supply chain efficiency is reduced [48].…”

“…Therefore, in the quest to achieve higher profit coupled with power dominance, the retailers tend to move away from cooperation [51]. Although, a non-cooperative contract may help the power-dominating player earn more profit, the overall profit of the supply chain is hindered [30]. Such a relationship can be termed as a vertical alliance between a leader and a follower.…”

“…Retailers in a supply chain act as a link between the final consumer and the manufacturer/supplier [29]. Retailers act as "gatekeepers", determining the market demands and placing orders with the manufacturer [30]. For a given cost of the product paid by the retailer to a textile manufacturer, the textile manufacturer's main objective is to maximize his profit by minimizing the investment in production (or product quality).…”

CSR within Large Retailers International Supply Chains

“…However, fewer studies have explored the importance of ethics in the buyer-seller relationships of retail companies (Dickerson and Dalecki, 1991;Arbuthnot, 1997;Musso 1999). Recently, the boundaries of the classic concept of business ethics have widened, entering the broader realm of CSR and sustainable development.…”