2001
DOI: 10.1080/00405000108659607
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Apparel Manufacturing Productivity in India: Characteristics of the Low, Medium and High Performers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Roy (2009) suggested that labour should be viewed as human capital requiring investments for the purpose of enhancing technical capabilities through training and for the purpose of raising wages. Further, Bheda, Singla, and Narag (2001) found that the garment factories which had invested in operator, supervisor and manager training were achieving higher productivity.…”
Section: Comparison Of Efficiency By Location and Scale-sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Roy (2009) suggested that labour should be viewed as human capital requiring investments for the purpose of enhancing technical capabilities through training and for the purpose of raising wages. Further, Bheda, Singla, and Narag (2001) found that the garment factories which had invested in operator, supervisor and manager training were achieving higher productivity.…”
Section: Comparison Of Efficiency By Location and Scale-sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tobit model has been used widely for identifying determinants of efficiency and is the selected model for analysis (Joshi & Singh, 2012). Disaggregate analysis compares performance of subgroups based on certain categorical firm-level attributes (Bheda et al, 2001; Chapelle & Plane, 2005; Kundi & Sharma, 2015).…”
Section: Empirical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most Indian firms are operating with excess production capacity and need to improve resource and capacity utilization to boost competitiveness (Hashim, 2005; Joshi & Singh, 2012). There is a lot of variation in interfirm performance and gains can be materialized by leveraging the correct factors (Bheda et al, 2001; Hill & Kalirajan, 1993, Kapelko & Lansink, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%