2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.parint.2010.08.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Apparent dominance of the G1–G3 genetic cluster of Echinococcus granulosus strains in the central inland region of Portugal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

3
18
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
3
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…G1 is also the common genotype in different hosts in Ethiopia [31], Tunisia [39], Palestine [41], Iran [42], India [43], China [44] and Mongolia [45]. Echinococcus granulosus s.s. (G1- G3 complex) is also the major genotype in humans, cattle, sheep and goats in many European and Latin American countries [27,46,47]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…G1 is also the common genotype in different hosts in Ethiopia [31], Tunisia [39], Palestine [41], Iran [42], India [43], China [44] and Mongolia [45]. Echinococcus granulosus s.s. (G1- G3 complex) is also the major genotype in humans, cattle, sheep and goats in many European and Latin American countries [27,46,47]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…granulosus s.s. These two genotypes have already been described in Europe in sheep and cattle, notably in Italy (Busi et al 2007; Casulli et al 2008), Romania (Bart et al 2006), Portugal (Beato et al 2010) and Turkey (Vural et al 2008). The genotype G1 is mainly responsible for infection in humans, but genotypes G2 and G3 are known to be infectious as well (Busi et al 2007; Eckert and Thompson 1997; Maillard et al 2007).…”
mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The PCRs allowed the discrimination between all Echinococcus species and genotypes included in this study, and phylogenetic trees constructed using either rrnS, rrnL or concatenated sequence data produced similar topologies, in particular the close relationships between E. granulosus s.s. or E. canadensis genotype members [5]. Since the discrimination between G1 and G3 has been a controversial issue and has largely relied on the use of mitochondrial gene markers [26], many studies have allowed only E. granulosus s.s. to be defined, without a discrimination among genotypes G1, G2 and G3 [50,51]. The PCRs should also be tested on DNA isolated directly from faeces from Echinococcus-infected definitive hosts [54], or even from environmental samples, such as soil or water [55].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, molecular phylogenetic analyses have relied on DNA sequence data obtained from partial single loci (ranging from ~250 to 500 bp in length), particularly from mitochondrial DNA loci, such as cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 (cox1) [17,22,23], NADH dehydrogenase subunit (nad1) [22][23][24][25], ATP synthase subunit (atp6) [26] and the small subunit (SSU) of the rRNA gene [27,28]. However, these relatively short sequences have insufficient discriminatory power to resolve fine scale taxonomic peculiarities (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%