2020
DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/gxwuc
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Apparent evidence for unconscious sound symbolism is probably artifactual: Commentary on Heyman, Maerten, Vankrunkelsven, Voorspoels and Moors (in press).

Abstract: Sound symbolism refers to the intuition that a word’s sound should match the characteristics of its referents – e.g., kiki should label something spiky – and its prevalence and systematicity provide compelling evidence for an intuitive mapping between linguistic form and meaning. Striking recent work (Hung, Styles, & Hsieh, 2017) suggests that these mappings may have an unconscious basis, such that participants can compute the fit between a word’s sound and an object’s shape when both are masked from a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, we should note a potential limitation of our findings: we used the same small set of face stimuli employed in previous studies that examined the eye-contact effect (Akechi et al, 2014;Madipakkam et al, 2015Madipakkam et al, , 2019Seymour et al, 2016;Stein, Senju, et al, 2011). Although it is important to verify that findings obtained with these stimuli hold up when using our more-rigorous methodology, the question of whether the findings would generalise to other face stimuli remains open, and raises the concern that this research domain may be limited by its reliance on a small number of potentially idiosyncratic stimuli (Rabagliati, 2020;Yarkoni, 2019). Future studies should address this issue by including a broader range of stimulus sets.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, we should note a potential limitation of our findings: we used the same small set of face stimuli employed in previous studies that examined the eye-contact effect (Akechi et al, 2014;Madipakkam et al, 2015Madipakkam et al, , 2019Seymour et al, 2016;Stein, Senju, et al, 2011). Although it is important to verify that findings obtained with these stimuli hold up when using our more-rigorous methodology, the question of whether the findings would generalise to other face stimuli remains open, and raises the concern that this research domain may be limited by its reliance on a small number of potentially idiosyncratic stimuli (Rabagliati, 2020;Yarkoni, 2019). Future studies should address this issue by including a broader range of stimulus sets.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%