In the past decades, there has been a growing concern about alternative energy sources. Power cycles developed during the industrial revolution require thermal sources with elevated temperatures to achieve an acceptable efficiency. Therefore, some of the heat generated in chemical and power plants is unsuitable for such cycles. In the chemical industry, several exothermic chemical reactions take place and the heat released by them must be removed to obtain better conversions. This heat is usually used to produce low pressure steam, which has a low capital value if there is no immediate application. In Part I of this work, a design procedure for a multitubular catalytic reactor for the Water-Gas Shift Reaction (WGSR) is proposed. WGSR is an exothermic reaction conducted in two adiabatic reactors with intermediate cooling so that it can achieve the desired conversion. The goal is to study the feasibility of replacing the usual configuration by one reactor with integrated heat exchange. Firstly, a catalyst screening procedure was carried out and the Cu-based catalyst was chosen as the most appropriate one. The reactor was modeled considering mass and heat transport phenomena. In addition, gas behavior was modeled by the Peng-Robinson-Stryjek-Vera equation of state. After proper validation against experimental and industrial data, the model was used in an optimization procedure for 3 different cases (OPT1, OPT2 and OPT3). The optimization results have upmost shown that using the multitubular reactor within the low temperature range of 430 K to 520 K is disadvantageous because of the considerable increase in the catalyst required amount. However, the use of such reactor tends to be desirable if a more active catalyst is used or for a more exothermic reaction. In Part II, a thermoeconomic assessment was carried out. The Part I's reactor cooling fluid was used as heat source for either e regular Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) or for a recuperative one (RORC). By considering the heat source temperature, environmental and safety aspects, from 78 initial potential working fluids, 6 were selected. After the power cycle simulations, methanol and ethanol had shown the best performance in the ORC configuration, whereas the other fluids performance became competitive only with the addition of a recuperator (RORC). In the economic analysis, net power generation plays a major role. For case OPT2 (≈250 kW net) and OPT3 (≈850 kW net), the power generation revenue was insufficient to cover the operational expenses, yielding unfeasible scenarios. However, for OPT1 (≈2.5 MW net), economic feasibility was achieved even for low operating pressures. Power cycle thermoeconomic performance was the best for methanol as working fluid. In the best scenario, an attractive internal rate of return of 14.5% and a pay-back period of 7 years were achieved.