2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2016.04.152
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Apparent kinetics of the catalyzed water–gas shift reaction in synthetic wood gas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The model obtained was considered good. Similar results were also obtained by Plaza et al (2016) for different operation conditions. However, they were not able to determine the minimum amount of H 2 S required for superior performance of the Co-Mo-based catalyst.…”
supporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The model obtained was considered good. Similar results were also obtained by Plaza et al (2016) for different operation conditions. However, they were not able to determine the minimum amount of H 2 S required for superior performance of the Co-Mo-based catalyst.…”
supporting
confidence: 87%
“…Plaza, A et al (2016). "Apparent kinetics of the catalyzed water-gas shift reaction in synthetic wood gas".…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mole balance for species “ i ” in the particle is given by eq . r WGS ′ in eq represents the reaction rate for the sour WGS reaction over the Co–Mo/γ-Al 2 O 3 catalyst, and the rate expression is given by eq …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…r WGS ′ in eq 16 represents the reaction rate for the sour WGS reaction over the Co−Mo/γ-Al 2 O 3 catalyst, and the rate expression is given by eq 17. 27 i k j j j j j j y The boundary conditions for solving eq 16 are given by eqs 18 and 19, while the initial condition is given by eq 20.…”
Section: = K D Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is due to the reaction rate model found for the sour shift catalyst predicting very low reaction rates in the temperature range of the LTSR as shown in Table 6. This puzzling result indicates that the chosen CoMo catalysts would be effective only in the temperature ranges well above the LTSR temperature [35] and other sulphur-resistant catalysts must be taken for the LTSR. Such catalysts may be commercially available, but to the best of our knowledge their reaction rate models have not been reported in open literatures yet.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Sweet And Sour Shift Reactorsmentioning
confidence: 99%