2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.tecto.2017.02.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Apparent polar wander path for Adria extended by new Jurassic paleomagnetic results from its stable core: Tectonic implications

Abstract: As a continuation of a systematic paleomagnetic research in the northern part of stable Adria, which provided a well-defined apparent polar wander (APW) path for the CretaceousEocene, we present new paleomagnetic results for the Jurassic. These new data were obtained from 15 geographically distributed localities from the Trento platform (eastern Southern Alps) using standard paleomagnetic approach. The Lower Jurassic shallow water carbonates are not considered for tectonic interpretation, due to inconsistent i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This applies to all continental fragments and oceanic domains in the entire Neotethyan realm. Furthermore, the movement path of for instance the Adriatic microcontinent in the above cited reconstructions deviates considerably from the apparent polar wander path calculated from the direct paleomagnetic data gathered by Márton, Zampieri, et al (2017). These discrepancies indicate that, besides of large-scale plate motions imposed by the breakup of Pangea, an exertion of additional driving forces has to be considered, too.…”
Section: Continuity and Episodicity Of Tectonic Processesmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…This applies to all continental fragments and oceanic domains in the entire Neotethyan realm. Furthermore, the movement path of for instance the Adriatic microcontinent in the above cited reconstructions deviates considerably from the apparent polar wander path calculated from the direct paleomagnetic data gathered by Márton, Zampieri, et al (2017). These discrepancies indicate that, besides of large-scale plate motions imposed by the breakup of Pangea, an exertion of additional driving forces has to be considered, too.…”
Section: Continuity and Episodicity Of Tectonic Processesmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Adria is generally considered to be an independent rigid microplate, encompassing the Po Plain, the Adriatic Sea, and Apulia [1,[8][9][10][11]. After a first tectonic phase in which Adria acted as a promontory of Africa, the two plates decoupled around the late Cretaceous-Paleocene transition [11].…”
Section: Tectonic Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3C) rotations, respectively. The examples represent paleomagnetic results obtained from the northern part of stable Adria (Adriatic microplate, Márton et al 2017). Figure 3A shows that Adria must have been at about 16°N at 155 Ma It follows that the correct interpretation of a paleo-declination is easier for younger than older rocks from the same tectonic unit.…”
Section: Fig 3 Interpretation Of Paleomagnetic Inclinations Which Constrain the Latitude Where The Rocks Acquired Magnetizationsmentioning
confidence: 99%