2022
DOI: 10.4289/0013-8797.123.4.721
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Apparent Recall of Past Homing Locations by Microbembex monodonta Say (Hymenoptera: Crabronidae) — An Observation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In each shift-trial wasps eventually located their burrow. All responded similarly to the one shown in Fig 4A . Before attempting to dig for their burrows the wasps reacted by flying around the shifted configuration of local landmarks for two to three minutes, almost always where the configuration led them and their initial digging attempt was always at a location where, relative to the landmark array, they had found their burrow on their previous return (see [56]) for more evidence of this rapid location learning). Eventually the wasps corrected themselves and dug at their burrow entrances, which had not been disturbed; they did so by first hovering over the place they had been misled to dig, then flew directly above the actual burrow entrance, landed, and dug.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In each shift-trial wasps eventually located their burrow. All responded similarly to the one shown in Fig 4A . Before attempting to dig for their burrows the wasps reacted by flying around the shifted configuration of local landmarks for two to three minutes, almost always where the configuration led them and their initial digging attempt was always at a location where, relative to the landmark array, they had found their burrow on their previous return (see [56]) for more evidence of this rapid location learning). Eventually the wasps corrected themselves and dug at their burrow entrances, which had not been disturbed; they did so by first hovering over the place they had been misled to dig, then flew directly above the actual burrow entrance, landed, and dug.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tinbergen, for instance, found that the effectiveness of homing cues depends on aspects such as size, height, contrast with surroundings, color, texture, edges, shapes, patterns, surface area and even shadows [20]. Some investigators found the height of salient cues, which probably provided increased contrast against the sky, was primarily relevant for homing [7,10,14,19,21,22], while van Iersel and van den Assem [10] working with Bembix rostrata, using large flat rings, found surface area to be more important than height. Baerends [14] also believed that surface area of visual cues was an important property of landmarks used for homing.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations