1961
DOI: 10.1126/science.133.3451.460
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Appearance of a Spring Maximum in Nuclear Test Debris in 1960

Abstract: The existence of a spring maximum in fallout deposition due to the disruption of the tropopause in middle latitudes has been debated for the past several years. Evidence obtained from air filters indicates elevated levels of radioactivity from nuclear tests in surface air during April through July 1960.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

1961
1961
1997
1997

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 that the effectiveness of the moratorium was essentially terminated in late October, 1964 due to tropospheric debris from the first Chinese nuclear test at that time. The 1964 spring peak is in agreement with the observed maximum in the spring of 1960 which occurred more than a year after the voluntary test moratorium of 1959 (GusTArSON, BRAR, and KERRIGAN [12]). …”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1 that the effectiveness of the moratorium was essentially terminated in late October, 1964 due to tropospheric debris from the first Chinese nuclear test at that time. The 1964 spring peak is in agreement with the observed maximum in the spring of 1960 which occurred more than a year after the voluntary test moratorium of 1959 (GusTArSON, BRAR, and KERRIGAN [12]). …”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…In every year since about 1955 a spring maximum of surface radioactive fallout resulting from nuclear testing has been measured in the Northern Hemisphere (MACHTA [15], FRY, JEW, and KURODA [11], LIBBY [13], LIBBY and PALMER [14], BLEICHRODT, BLOK, and DEKKER [2], BLEICHRODT, BLOK, and VAN ABKOUDE [3], GUSTAFSON, BRAR, and KERRIGAN [12], PIERSON [29], MAHLMAN [17,18,20]). This spring peak is distinct from the heavy fallout that is observed to follow shortly after periods of extensive testing in the atmosphere.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FRY, JEw and Ku~oDA [8] studied the 1959 peak by chemical dating methods and concluded that it contained debris which was older than could be explained by the Russian tests. Measurements taken at Argonne National Laboratory revealed an increase of cesium-137 from April to June 1960, although no nuclear tests were made in the previous year (GusTAF-SON et al [10]). Analyses of artificially produced tritium showed spring maxima for the years 1958, 1959 and 1960 that are remarkably in phase with the strontium-90 measurements for those years (LIBBY [14]).…”
Section: Literature Pertaining To the Problemmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…276 16 b1AY 1997 assum~tion that the observed seasonal vari-tratro~ical cjlclone growth well enough to eauatorward and downward movement of ation of surface radioactive fallout (resulting from detonations of nuclear weapons that initially deposit their radioactive debris into the stratosphere) is related to the seasonal variation in the intensity of extratropical cyclones (13). Later it was found that the cyclogenesis process is active throughout the year in its movement of lower stratospheric air into the troposphere, thus leading to the assertion that the tropospheric seasonal radioactivity cycle and its spring peak depend mainly on the seasonal variations in the extratronical downward mass flux to the vicinity of the tropopause (14).…”
Section: Transport Across the Tropopausementioning
confidence: 99%