1990
DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/52.2.214
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Appendicular skeletal muscle mass: measurement by dual-photon absorptiometry

Abstract: Dual-photon absorptiometry (DPA) allows separation of body mass into bone mineral, fat, and fat-free soft tissue. This report evaluates the potential of DPA to isolate appendages of human subjects and to quantify extremity skeletal muscle mass (limb fat-free soft tissue). The method was evaluated in 34 healthy adults who underwent DPA study, anthropometry of the limbs, and estimation of whole-body skeletal muscle by models based on total body potassium (TBK) and nitrogen (TBN) and on fat-free body mass (FFM). … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
511
0
14

Year Published

1996
1996
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 749 publications
(528 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
3
511
0
14
Order By: Relevance
“…The second scan was required if the participant ( n  = 2) did not fit within the lateral limits of the scanning table; these scans were analysed by summing left and right segments of the body bisected along the mid‐line of the spine, as previously described 15. Using Hologic software (version 13.2), the whole‐body scan was segmented into the head, trunk, left, and right upper limbs and left and right lower limbs by a single investigator according to a standardized protocol 16. The lean tissue mass in the upper and lower limbs, known as appendicular lean tissue mass, was summed and used for all regression analysis as this lean tissue depot is predominately skeletal muscle mass and has strong associations with whole‐body muscle mass measured by using MRI 17.…”
Section: Participants and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second scan was required if the participant ( n  = 2) did not fit within the lateral limits of the scanning table; these scans were analysed by summing left and right segments of the body bisected along the mid‐line of the spine, as previously described 15. Using Hologic software (version 13.2), the whole‐body scan was segmented into the head, trunk, left, and right upper limbs and left and right lower limbs by a single investigator according to a standardized protocol 16. The lean tissue mass in the upper and lower limbs, known as appendicular lean tissue mass, was summed and used for all regression analysis as this lean tissue depot is predominately skeletal muscle mass and has strong associations with whole‐body muscle mass measured by using MRI 17.…”
Section: Participants and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ASM (kg) was defined as the sum of the lean soft tissue masses for the arms and legs, after the method of Heymsfield et al 15 The ASM adjusted by stature index (ASM/height 2 ) was also computed as described by Baumgartner et al 16 In this study, sex-specific ASM/height 2 quintiles were created. For women, the bounds for ASM/ height 2 17 The SMI (%) (total skeletal muscle mass (kg)/weight (kg) Â 100) was obtained by calculating the total skeletal muscle mass adjusted by weight as described by Janssen et al 3 As with ASM/height 2 , SMI was divided into sex-specific quintiles to facilitate the interpretation of the odds ratios (OR Definitions of sarcopenia and SO First, sarcopenia was defined as an ASM/height 2 less than two s.d.…”
Section: Definition Of Metabolic Syndromementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The appendicular skeletal muscle mass was calculated as the sum of the arm and leg fat-free soft tissue. 16 …”
Section: Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometrymentioning
confidence: 99%