1941
DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.1941.01210080111006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Appendix Vermiformis Duplex

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
2

Year Published

1941
1941
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
19
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…1). This duplication is reported as developing from the persistence of the transient cecal protuberance of the sixth embryonic week [2][3][4][5]. Type B duplications, especially when one appendix lies retrocecally, presents the largest risk of being unnoticed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1). This duplication is reported as developing from the persistence of the transient cecal protuberance of the sixth embryonic week [2][3][4][5]. Type B duplications, especially when one appendix lies retrocecally, presents the largest risk of being unnoticed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Appendiceal duplications were classified by Wallbridge [12] and Waugh [13]. Wallbridge's 1962 classification divides these duplications into three groups [12].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was an incidental finding during the laparotomy for an uretero-ileal conduit. Waugh (1941) described three types of appendicular duplication: (a) 'double barrelled appendix', with a common muscularis and often a distal communication between the lumen of the two appendices (b) 'bird type paired appendix', where two appendices are symmetrically placed on either side of the ileocaecal valve. All such reported cases have been found in newborn who had associated severe congenital defects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%