2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2010.08.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Appetitive and regulatory processes in young adolescent drinkers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
40
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
4
40
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This result differed from the results obtained with late-adolescents and adults, who presented strong implicit alcohol-approach associations (Field, Mogg & Bradley, 2005;Field, Kiernan, Eastwood & Child, 2008;Palfai & Ostafin, 2003;. Van Hemel-Ruiter et al (2011) ascribed these differences to the fact that younger participants had a shorter alcohol use record, insufficient to produce strong implicit alcohol-approach associations. They also clarified that the weak implicit alcohol-approach associations detected among heavy drinkers could be due to a negative conditioning to alcohol.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This result differed from the results obtained with late-adolescents and adults, who presented strong implicit alcohol-approach associations (Field, Mogg & Bradley, 2005;Field, Kiernan, Eastwood & Child, 2008;Palfai & Ostafin, 2003;. Van Hemel-Ruiter et al (2011) ascribed these differences to the fact that younger participants had a shorter alcohol use record, insufficient to produce strong implicit alcohol-approach associations. They also clarified that the weak implicit alcohol-approach associations detected among heavy drinkers could be due to a negative conditioning to alcohol.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 93%
“…Among adolescents, against all expectations, one article found that heavy drinkers have weaker implicit alcohol-approach associations than light drinkers did (van Hemel-Ruiter et al, 2011). This result differed from the results obtained with late-adolescents and adults, who presented strong implicit alcohol-approach associations (Field, Mogg & Bradley, 2005;Field, Kiernan, Eastwood & Child, 2008;Palfai & Ostafin, 2003;.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, this was the case only for those participants for whom approach (or avoidance) training resulted in faster alcohol-approach (or avoid) reaction times. Van Hemel-Ruiter et al (2011) reported a negative correlation between the AAT score for alcohol-related pictures and alcohol use, but a positive correlation with subjective valence of alcohol (i.e., the stronger participants' approach bias, the less alcohol they used, and the more positively they judged alcohol). Furthermore, in their study concerning cannabis use, Cousijn and colleagues (2011) report that AAT scores correlated negatively with subjective craving (i.e., a stronger approach bias was associated with weaker subjective craving) but they did not find significant correlations with other criteria (e.g., baseline cannabis use, cannabis-related problems, smoking).…”
Section: Measures Of Automatic Motivational Tendenciesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Thus, rSRC scores can correlate positively, negatively, or not at all, with drugrelated behaviors. Research with the modified Simon Task is scarce, but so far no significant correlations with drug-related behavior have been found Van Hemel-Ruiter et al, 2011).…”
Section: Measures Of Automatic Motivational Tendenciesmentioning
confidence: 99%