2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2008.11.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applicability of local magnetic measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It depends on the above-mentioned uncontrollable experimental factors and also includes the technological deviations of steel microstructure, which can provide a comparable result error [15]. In addition, the accurate direct field measurement provides a physically based reference to the real magnetization state of the sample surface [14,20]. In our case of carefully performed experiments, even the commonly used method of evaluating the field proportionally to the magnetization current gives the comparable results (see Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…It depends on the above-mentioned uncontrollable experimental factors and also includes the technological deviations of steel microstructure, which can provide a comparable result error [15]. In addition, the accurate direct field measurement provides a physically based reference to the real magnetization state of the sample surface [14,20]. In our case of carefully performed experiments, even the commonly used method of evaluating the field proportionally to the magnetization current gives the comparable results (see Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…However, the AC BN measurement is unstable due to variations of the sample magnetic properties and of the yoke lift-off [5,9]. The appropriate solution to this problem is control of the magnetization conditions by a feedback system, keeping the field/flux waveform identical to a prescribed standard [2,22,26].…”
Section: Article In Pressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recent improvements in measurement techniques and in magnetic Hall/GMR (giant magnetoresistive) sensors create the necessary prerequisites for this next qualitative advance in the field of magnetic testing [3,10,12]. An integrated BN sensor is proposed to combine the single yoke, the field sensor/s for magnetization control with digital feedback, and the pancake coil for the BN measurement [13,24,26].…”
Section: Article In Pressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is interesting to note, that the magnetic FEM was rarely if ever used in the context of quantitative MMM-related research. The authors know only of simulations concerning qualitative magnetic defectoscopy [9,[21][22][23]. The only work aiming at defining a quantitative stress-field with magnetic FEM and experiment [24] did not attain the objectives, as declared by its author.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%